From Latin American Weekly Report

Items

  • US drops a gentle hint

    LatinNews 23 October 2015 Hits: 2

    Since 2008, under the terms of the Mérida Initiative, the US Congress has channelled around US$2.3bn into Mexico to fund efforts to crack down on the drug running business – money that goes towards buying helicopter gunships, funding tighter border controls, and training members of the security services. This year US$148m is being sent – down by a symbolic US$5m on the amount that would otherwise be due, as a sign of Washington’s concern over the poor observation of human rights in the country. Will the Mexican government get the message?

    Mérida Initiative

    Under current US rules, Congress should release the full amount of Mérida Initiative funds every year, providing it receives a report from the State Department confirming that Mexico has met human rights goals. Up to 15% of total funding is subject to this confirmation. This year the report was not submitted.

    The State Department had already expressed concern over the abduction and presumed murder of 43 student teachers in Iguala, Guerrero in September last year; over the apparent extra-judicial execution of 22 people by the army in Tlatlaya, Estado de México, in June 2014, and over various other incidents. The State Department has also spoken of Mexican security force involvement in torture and disappearances.

    US$5m question

    Now a decision has been taken to hold back US$5m. Off the record, US analysts and officials have described it as “an attempt to send a subtle message to the Mexican government without making a big deal about it through public pronouncements”. Another source said it was a signal of displeasure but “without any public criticism”, and as such, was designed to maintain Mexico and the US as “willing partners in the war on drugs”.

    Will the US$5m hint work? It is hard to say. In an attempt to produce a balanced response the Mexican foreign ministry issued a statement saying it “observed with respect” the way the US State Department managed its relationship with the US Congress, but that it could not accept “unilateral practices to judge the human rights situation in any country”. However, it too tried to downplay the matter, adding that the two countries have a “mature and deep” bilateral relationship and a “solid dialogue” over how best to take forward the campaign against organised crime.

    Weak position

    Mexico’s position is clearly weak. While the government says it is committed to the observation of human rights in principle, there is a big gap between this and everyday realities. Iguala, Tlatlaya, and many other incidents show that the security forces have been infiltrated by criminal organisations and weakened by corruption. Reforms of the police and criminal justice system – some also partly funded by the US – have been dragging on for years with at best mixed results. Some other reform initiatives – such as the creation of unified state police forces – remain stuck in congress.

    While the government’s reluctance to be judged unilaterally on human rights matters by its powerful northern neighbour is understandable, the fact is that multilateral organisations have also had serious criticism to make (see sidebar). Ultimately, tackling some of the worst cases will involve the federal government admitting that some of its own institutions are complicit or even directly responsible for major human rights violations. That implies a root-and-branch shake-up that, to date, the authorities seem to lack the political will to set in motion.

    • International criticism

    The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) have both criticised Mexico’s record on human rights in recent weeks [WR-15-41]. An international committee of experts appointed by the IACHR to look into the handling of the Iguala case has been devastatingly critical of the poor quality of the official investigation. And during a visit to Mexico this month Zeid Ra’ad Zeid al-Hussein, the UN high commissioner for human rights, described the death toll from violence in the country between 2006 and 2015 as “simply staggering” (on the UN’s count a total of 151,233 people were killed in that period).

    • New mint

    On 14 October Mexico’s central bank (Banxico) announced plans to build a new US$180m banknote printing mint. The new mint that is to be located in the municipality of El Salto, Jalisco state, will be Banxico’s second and should help to satisfy the country’s demand for banknotes for years to come once it comes on stream in 2017. President Enrique Peña Nieto, who attended a groundbreaking ceremony in El Salto, which also marked the 90th anniversary of Banxico’s foundation, said that the new mint would ensure “the long-term provision of national currency, mitigating the risks associated with concentrating banknote printing in just one place”.

  • TRACKING TRENDS

    LatinNews 23 October 2015 Hits: 2

    MEXICO | US cargo accord

    Mexico’s finance minister, Luis Videgaray, signed an accord with the US secretary of homeland security, Jeh Johnson, last week formalising a cargo pre-inspection programme to help speed up the flow of goods across the shared border.

    Under this programme Mexican and US customs officials will carry out joint inspections to help expedite the passage of trucks across the shared border, which is notorious for long delays, with a knock-on effect for economic competitiveness.

    The cargo pre-inspection programme has been in place in Laredo international airport in Texas since late last year. It will now begin in the Mesa de Otay customs in Tijuana, Baja California state, for the processing of agricultural goods, and will later be extended to the San Jerónimo border crossing in Chihuahua state. Its introduction in Mexico had been held up because of a domestic political debate over whether US agents should be allowed to carry arms in Mexico, but last April Mexico’s federal congress approved a law removing this impediment.

    MEXICO | Results from social development programmes

    On 15 October Mexico’s President Enrique Peña Nieto presented the latest results from his government’s ‘national crusade against hunger’ social development programme that aims to alleviate poverty. Speaking during a public event held in the Estado de México (Edomex) to mark Global Food Day (16 October), Peña Nieto said that since its launch in 2013 the programme has helped feed 4.5m poor Mexicans.

    Citing figures from the national social development policy evaluation council (Coneval) on the preliminary results of the national crusade against hunger, Peña Nieto said that the programme had helped to reduce food insecurity in Edomex, which was down by 6% (and extreme poverty by 19%) in 2014 on 2010 levels. “We are working on various fronts to tackle poverty and food insecurity in order to get the necessary results,” Peña Nieto said.

    Fernando Soto Barquero, Mexico’s representative before the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), said that while Mexico has made significant progress in reducing food insecurity in recent decades, much more remained to be done. Soto pointed out that the incidence of malnourishment in Mexico had fallen from 6.9% of the population in 1992 to less than 5% last year, putting Mexico among the seven Latin American countries that currently are below the target threshold set by the FAO. In fact, Soto pointed out that Mexico’s ‘Prospera’ conditional cash transfer programme for the poor has been singled out for praise in the FAO’s State of Food and Agriculture (Sofa) 2015 report.

    Prospera currently benefits 26m people, making it the world’s third largest conditional transfer poverty alleviation programme behind India’s ‘Janani Suraksha Yojana’ (which benefits 78m people) and Brazil’s ‘Bolsa Família’ (49m people).

    However, on a less positive note the latest Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) report on social development indicators, released on 14 October, found that Mexico’s social development indicators are “mediocre” in areas such as education, poverty reduction, and quality of employment; and that these vary greatly across the country’s states. For example the OECD report points out that, according to its multidimensional poverty indicator (which takes into consideration 12 different factors such as income, employment quality, and access to education), 76% of the population in the state of Chiapas was classified as poor last year, compared to 20% of the population of Nuevo León state.