Who's competing for power in 2026?

Items

  • Introduction

    Patrick de Courcy 26 January 2026 Hits: 1893

    This year will see voters head to the polls in four Latin American countries - Costa Rica, Peru, Colombia, and Brazil - and at least two in the Caribbean, where elections are due in The Bahamas and an early election has been called in Barbados. Elections are also due in Haiti, although these remain far from certain. While incumbent or continuity candidates are currently expected to perform well in some races, such as in Barbados, Costa Rica, and, with less certainty, Brazil, other races remain wide open. As recent years have shown, outsider candidates should not be ruled out as disillusionment with the political classes remains high.

    Costa Rica will kick off the electoral calendar with elections due on 1 February. The previous 2021/2022 electoral cycle produced a victory for political outsider Rodrigo Chaves. Despite controversies and rising concerns around insecurity, Chaves remains broadly popular and his continuity candidate, Laura Fernández is currently polling as the frontrunner.

    Continuity is less likely in Peru, where over 30 candidates will compete for the presidency on 12 April. While most polls point to a right-wing victory, nothing can be ruled out in what looks set to be a deeply unpredictable race with high chances for an outsider candidate to break through. An outsider candidate also stands a chance in Colombia’s May presidential elections, where far-right populist Abelardo De la Espriella is currently jostling with the leftist continuity candidate, Iván Cepeda, for poll position.

    In Brazil, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is seeking his fourth presidential term in October’s elections. However, the mood in the country appears to be shifting to the right, opening space for opposition-aligned figures. With former president Jair Bolsonaro (2019-2023) behind bars, his son, Flávio, currently appears to be the main candidate of the far-right ‘Bolsonarismo’ movement.

    Also seeking another term is Barbados’ Prime Minister Mia Mottley, who has called an early election in a bid for her third successive victory. The Bahamas’ Prime Minister Philip Davis is also gunning for re-election in elections due by October.

    Arguably the most uncertainty surrounds Haiti, where elections are supposed to take place in August. These are sorely needed - elections have not taken place since 2016. However, serious questions remain, not least as to whether security conditions will allow, with the transitional presidential council (CPT) tasked with enabling the elections failing to meet key milestones.

  • COSTA RICA: Continuity candidate remains favourite in uncertain race

    Patrick de Courcy 26 January 2026 Hits: 855

    Date: 1 February 2026. A presidential candidate must capture 40% + 1 of the valid vote to be elected or face a run-off election on 5 April 2026.

    Type: Presidential and legislative (57 seats in a unicameral legislature).

    Main presidential contenders: Laura Fernández (Partido Pueblo Soberano, PPSO), Álvaro Ramos (Partido Liberación Nacional, PLN); Ariel Robles (Frente Amplio, FA); Claudia Dobles (Coalición Agenda Ciudadana, CAC), Natalia Díaz (Unidos Podemos, UP); Juan Carlos Hidalgo (Partido Unidad Social Cristiana, PUSC); Fabricio Alvarado (Partido Nueva República, NR).

    The previous 2021/2022 electoral cycle produced a victory for former World Bank official, and finance minister (2019-2020) Rodrigo Chaves, of the centre-right Partido Progreso Social Democrático (PPSD). A political outsider, Chaves surprised many by even making it into the run-off where he defeated former president José María Figueres (1994-1998) of the established Partido Liberación Nacional, PLN) – a result which signalled a break with the political establishment. As president, Chaves has overseen continued economic stability and a reduction of the fiscal deficit, a major issue facing his predecessors, as well as embarking on a push to liberalise trade. His government concluded two agreements with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), an Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement and a Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF) arrangement, which were completed in June 2024 and were worth US$1.6bn and US$730m respectively. A February 2025 IMF report notes Costa Rica’s public debt fell from nearly 68% of GDP in 2021 to below 60% in 2024 due to various factors, including the Chaves administration’s tight fiscal policy, tax and public employment reforms enacted by the previous government, with annual economic growth rates averaging above 5% since 2021.

    • Liberalising trade

    As part of efforts to liberalise trade, Chaves has sought to join trade blocs such as the Pacific Alliance, which comprises Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. Costa Rica’s application was approved in December 2024, granting exporters from those nations greater access to the country’s market. The country has also agreed trade deals with Israel, Ecuador, and the United Arab Emirates. Chaves has also applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), an Asia-Pacific trade bloc, which agreed to start an accession process for Costa Rica in November 2024.

    Chaves’ four-year mandate has been dominated by security concerns as homicides have soared due to the growing presence of international drug trafficking organisations (DTOs) in the country. Homicides spiked to a record 905 in 2023, before recording a slight decrease to 876 in 2024 and 873 in 2025. The homicide rate in 2025 was 16.7 per 100,000 inhabitants, up from 16.6 in 2024 – below only Honduras (25.3 per 100,000) in Central America according to the latest homicide roundup published in February 2025 by specialist website Insight Crime. Last year former security minister (2014-2015) Celso Gamboa was arrested and charged with drug-related crimes in the US in what Insight Crime said “may be the most significant drug scandal in Costa Rica’s history”.

    Accordingly, insecurity has overtaken the economy and corruption as the key public concern. A December 2025 survey by the Centro de Investigación y Estudios Políticos (Ciep) of the public Universidad de Costa Rica (UCR) showed citizen security was cited as the main concern by 42.4% of respondents, followed by unemployment and economic growth (13.3%), and the fight against corruption (7.5%). An avowed supporter of El Salvador’s authoritarian President Nayib Bukele, Chaves has yet to implement the hardline measures implemented in El Salvador, where a state of exception has been in place since March 2022. This is due in no small part to his lack of control over key institutions like the legislature (which is controlled by the opposition), and judiciary although plans have been greenlit to build a new high security prison in Alajuela province to be known as the ‘Centro de Alta Contención del Crimen Organizado’ (Cacco).

    Chaves’ mandate has also been characterised by his clashes with the judiciary, legislature, and media, in part as he has faced various corruption cases. This has sparked concerns over the separation of powers and his respect for democratic institutions, which are among the strongest in Latin America. In an unprecedented move in 2025, the top court requested that the legislature strip Chaves of his immunity from prosecution in order that he be investigated over a corruption case tied to a communications contract. The electoral court then asked the legislature to lift Chaves’ immunity again over political belligerence and interference ahead of the election. Both requests were denied by the legislature.

    Yet Chaves’ popularity remains high. A January 2026 Ciep poll showed his approval at 58%, down from 63% in October but up from 52% in September and 54% in April. A group of analysts consulted by local media outlet El Observador in October 2025 attributes this enduring popularity to Chaves’ “personalistic leadership, a direct and combative style of communication, the ability to present himself as an ‘outsider’ and the weakness of the opposition”. Chaves is constitutionally barred from seeking a consecutive term and it is uncertain how far this popularity will transfer to Laura Fernández, his former minister of the presidency (2024-2025) and planning (2022-2025), who has cast herself as his heir. Fernández is running for Partido Pueblo Soberano (PPSO), a right-wing party formed in September 2022, to which the right-of-centre ‘Chavismo’ movement’ has migrated. She has indicated plans to offer Chaves the post of minister of the presidency if elected while her manifesto is entitled “More opportunities, the same direction, continuity plan” indicating her intent on continuing Chaves’ policies.

    While the January 2026 Ciep poll showed that 32.0% of respondents were undecided – indicating significant uncertainty surrounding the vote - the frontrunner by far was Fernández, who was polling at 40.0%, far ahead of her closest competitor, Álvaro Ramos (PLN) on 8.0%, and at the threshold to win the contest outright. Meanwhile Claudia Dobles, of the centre-left Coalición Agenda Ciudadana (CAC), was on 5.0%, while the remaining candidates were on 4.0% or less. Crucially, Fernández might also find it much easier to govern than Chaves if she wins election. The January Ciep poll showed that the PPSO would win more seats in the legislative assembly than any other party, with more than three times as much support as the PLN among decided voters (29% to 9%).

  • PERU: Anything could happen

    Patrick de Courcy 26 January 2026 Hits: 1021

    Date: 12 April. The presidential election will go to a second round on 7 June if no candidate wins more than 50% of the vote.

    Type: Presidential and legislative elections. There are 130 seats up for grabs in the lower chamber of congress and 60 in the senate, which has not sat since 1992 but is being resurrected following a constitutional reform.

    Main contenders: Rafael López Aliaga (Renovación Popular), Keiko Fujimori (Fuerza Popular), Carlos Álvarez (País para Todos)

    Peru’s presidential election should, according to most polls, produce a right-wing victory. But election forecasts have been complicated by the enormous number of candidates vying for the presidency. With over 30 contenders, the election seems certain to go to a second round. This raises the chances of an outsider candidate breaking through, as happened in the 2021 election which produced a surprise victory for the far-left Pedro Castillo (2021-2022). A key goal for the victor will be restoring a semblance of political stability following the impeachments of Castillo and his successor, Dina Boluarte (2022-2025). Indeed, serving out a full presidential term would be a major accomplishment, given that this has not been achieved since the election of Ollanta Humala (2011-2016).

    With 35 candidates seeking the presidency (36 if Mario Vizcarra overturns his ban), the election looks set to be deeply unpredictable. The candidate list is twice as long as it was in the 2021 election, when the relatively unknown Castillo broke out of a crowded field of 18 candidates to win a berth in the second round, before going on to scrape a narrow victory against the right-wing Keiko Fujimori. The conditions are right for another electoral upset, and mounting dissatisfaction with the political establishment might push voters towards an outsider candidate.

    • Mario Vizcarra

    Mario Vizcarra, the brother of imprisoned former president Martín Vizcarra (2018-2020), was hovering around third place in the polls before Lima’s special electoral council (JEE) ruled on 5 January that he should be excluded from the election. The JEE’s ruling can be appealed before the national electoral council (JNE). Vizcarra’s exclusion followed three challenges against his candidacy due to a prison sentence he received in 2005 for embezzlement. He has already served the sentence, which he was given for receiving a double salary while presiding over a transitional council in the south-eastern region of Moquegua in 2001, but electoral law precludes those with firm corruption convictions from standing for election.

    According to the latest region-wide Latinobarómetro poll, published in May 2025, Peruvians were the least satisfied with their government out of 17 countries surveyed, with just 5% approving of the running of their country, against an average Latin American approval rating of 43%. Peru was also the country where respondents were least satisfied with congress, with 91% of respondents saying that they did not feel that the institution represents them politically. Corruption was perceived to be more widespread in Peru than any other country in the survey, while only 7% of respondents felt positive about the state of the economy – the second-lowest figure in the survey after Bolivia. Compounding the negative picture, 44% of Peruvian respondents said that they or a close relative had been a victim of crime in the past year – the second-highest figure in the region after Ecuador.

    Voters are clearly deeply unhappy with the state of the country and have little faith that the mainstream parties will be able to remedy the situation. This poses a cautionary tale for the right-wing parties that have been calling the shots in congress since Castillo’s impeachment in December 2022, and for the conservative presidential candidates who are generally outperforming left-wingers in the polls.

    The leading candidate in most surveys is Rafael López Aliaga, the far-right former mayor of Lima (2023-2025), representing Renovación Popular (RP). He is followed in most polls by Fujimori, who is making a fourth run for the presidency with the right-wing Fuerza Popular (FP), and the centre-left Mario Vizcarra, the brother of imprisoned former president Martín Vizcarra (2018-2020) representing Perú Primero (PP), who is attempting to overturn an electoral ban. These three frontrunners have generally polled in the single digits, and in a sign that voters are looking for alternatives, they are facing competition from celebrity figures such as comedian Carlos Álvarez (País para Todos), whose poll numbers have improved since the new year, and retired footballer George Forsyth (Somos Perú – the party of interim President José Jerí, who took office following Boluarte’s impeachment in October 2025).

    With no candidate gaining momentum, the election is likely to be decided by the large number of undecided voters. According to an Ipsos poll published on 16 January, a startling 47% of respondents said they would cast blank or spoiled ballots or would not say who they intended to vote for, and a further 11% said they would vote for candidates other than the 12 contenders featured in the poll.

    The electoral landscape will be viewed with particular caution by Fujimori, who, after reaching the second round in 2011, 2016, and 2021, and losing by less than 0.3 percentage points on the latter two occasions, will have been hoping that 2026 is the year she finally reaches the presidential palace. There are several factors that could work in Fujimori’s favour. The scandal-plagued presidency of the 2021 victor, Castillo, may have pushed some swing voters to the right. The death in 2024 of her father, authoritarian former president Alberto Fujimori (1990-2000), may enable her and FP to lose some of their associations with Alberto Fujimori’s strangulation of democracy and the human rights abuses he presided over. Her party has also played a key role in the passage of hardline security legislation which seems popular with voters.

    At the same time, Fujimori is the classic establishment politician – exactly the sort of candidate which voters are seemingly ready to reject. She is by some measures the most powerful politician in Peru; as leader of FP, she rallied a broad conservative alliance against Castillo, eventually securing his impeachment, then spent nearly three years forcing Boluarte to tack ever further to the right before sealing her fate in the October impeachment vote. Since then she has exerted a similar influence by propping up President Jerí, albeit to a lesser degree given his relative popularity with the public.

    The growth of organised crime

    One factor which looks certain to shape the election, potentially to the benefit of right-wing populists like Fujimori and Aliaga, is the visible rise of organised crime over the past two years. Transport workers have repeatedly gone on strike in protest at violence meted out by extortion gangs, which have become increasingly brazen in their tactics – murdering transport workers in broad daylight, setting fire to buses in busy thoroughfares, and detonating bombs outside prosecutors’ offices. Rising concern about extortion was the final straw for Boluarte’s deeply unpopular government and was used to justify her impeachment.

    Candidates on both the left and right are jostling to present themselves as hardliners, with some describing themselves as students of El Salvador’s authoritarian President Nayib Bukele, whose harsh stance is being increasingly imitated throughout the region.

    The return of the senate

    In March 2024 congress approved a constitutional reform to resurrect the senate. The upper chamber of congress has not sat since 1992, when it was dissolved by Alberto Fujimori, and was eliminated in the 1993 constitution. There is reason to believe that the senate’s return could help reduce Peru’s chronic political instability. The unicameral system, in which legislators are unchecked by a second chamber of congress, has seen them increasingly flex their muscles through impeachment proceedings. Three presidents, Boluarte, Castillo, and Vizcarra, have been removed by congress since 2020, while Vizcarra’s predecessor, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski (2016-2018), chose to resign when faced with the imminent prospect of impeachment.

    Jerí not seeking another term

    President Jerí, who took office in October 2025 following the impeachment of former president Boluarte, is not standing in the elections, and has said that he is working with “less time, but more commitment” than his predecessors before handing over power to the election’s winner in July. He appears broadly popular with voters, however. A CPI poll published on 4 December gave him a 52.0% approval rating – a remarkable turnaround from the depths of unpopularity reached by Boluarte, who regularly polled around 2%. The same CPI poll showed far less enthusiasm for the main presidential contenders. The far-right Rafael López Aliaga led with an approval rating of 12.5%, followed by the right-wing Keiko Fujimori (7.6%) and the centre-left Mario Vizcarra (6.7%).

  • COLOMBIA: Deep polarisation to squeeze out moderates

    Patrick de Courcy 26 January 2026 Hits: 876

    Date: 31 May. If no presidential candidate secures an absolute majority of the valid votes in the first round, a second round run-off will be held on 21 June.

    Type: Presidential and congressional. Congressional elections will be held on 8 March for the lower chamber of congress and senate.

    Main contenders: Iván Cepeda (ruling left-wing coalition Pacto Histórico); Abelardo De la Espriella (far-right Defensores de la Patria); Sergio Fajardo (centrist Dignidad y Compromiso). One candidate to emerge from a consultation being held concurrently with congressional elections to represent the Gran Consulta por Colombia coalition from Senator Paloma Valencia (right-wing Centro Democrático [CD]); Juan Carlos Pinzón (unaffiliated); Juan Daniel Oviedo (unaffiliated); Aníbal Gaviria (centrist Partido Liberal [PL]); Juan Manuel Galán, centrist Nuevo Liberalismo; David Luna, right-of-centre Cambio Radical [CR]); Vicky Dávila (unaffiliated); and Mauricio Cárdenas, centre-right Partido Conservador [PC]).

    Colombia will hold potentially its most consequential elections in a generation on 31 May. Much the same could have been written ahead of the 2022 contest which saw the country’s first genuine left-wing candidate, Gustavo Petro, a former M-19 guerrilla, come to power. Petro’s victory and the challenge he posed to the political establishment ultimately pushed most right-wing and centrist parties to form an electoral alliance to try and prevent his continuity candidate (Petro is constitutionally barred from seeking re-election), Senator Iván Cepeda, from succeeding him. But they risk being outflanked by a media-savvy far-right populist, Abelardo De la Espriella, who has shot to prominence.

    There is a huge amount at stake. President Petro’s combative rhetoric has seen him engage in spiralling spats on social media with US President Donald Trump, upending years of close bilateral diplomatic relations. This was thrown into sharp relief by the US military operation to seize Venezuela’s leader Nicolás Maduro on 3 January, after which Trump publicly mooted intervention in Colombia, telling Petro to “watch his ass”. Colombia now finds itself in a new geopolitical reality with a more muscular US bent on reassertion of its primacy in the region, rewarding ideological allies, such as Argentina’s President Javier Milei and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, and wielding the big stick for those that do not share this affinity. Against this backdrop and with the two frontrunners, Cepeda and De la Espriella, situated on either extreme of the political spectrum, these elections eclipse those of 2022 in significance for Colombia and its future.

    Clearly concerned that the prospect of his suffering the same fate as Maduro might not be as far-fetched as it would have seemed, Petro put in a call to Trump to try and defuse tensions on 7 January and they spoke for over an hour. Trump said he appreciated the gesture and the two heads of state even agreed to meet in the White House (a date of 3 February was subsequently agreed), but even if this goes comparatively well, relations could still sour in the months ahead, especially if Cepeda falls back in the polls and Petro suspects US electoral interference in favour of his right-wing rivals.

    Cepeda enjoyed a decent lead in electoral surveys published in late 2025 but in the most recent survey, by AtlasIntel, carried out in the days following the US military operation in Venezuela, De la Espriella moved ahead, polling 28% to 26.5% for Cepeda. While they were separated by little, the survey projected an emphatic victory for De la Espriella over Cepeda in a likely second round on 21 June of 44.2% to 34.9%.

    A separate survey released a week later by Spanish pollster GAD3 suggested Cepeda retained an advantage over De la Espriella of 30%-22% and would defeat him in a run-off by 40%-32%. The sample was smaller, however, with only some 1,200 respondents compared with over 4,500 in the AtlasIntel poll. Where both polls agreed was that nobody else is in contention – for now. AtlasIntel had Sergio Fajardo, a centrist former mayor of Medellín and former governor of Antioquia, in third place on 9.4% followed by Senator Paloma Valencia, of the right-wing Centro Democrático (CD), and Juan Carlos Pinzón, a former defence minister and ambassador to the US, tied in fourth on 5.1%. The GAD3 poll had the third-place candidate, Valencia, even further adrift on 3%.

    The race could still be shaken up by developments on 8 March, however, when the Gran Consulta por Colombia coalition will hold a consultation featuring eight candidates ranging from the centre to the right of the spectrum. Both surveys suggested that Valencia is the favourite to emerge triumphant in this contest. If the support for the other seven candidates predominantly transferred to her afterwards, she would shoot up the polls.

    Together with Pinzón’s support, Valencia would reach 10.2% and while none of the other candidates competing in the consultation polled more than 1.8% in the AtlasIntel survey, for instance, altogether their combined support comes to 6.4%, bringing a grand total of 16.6%. Even if all of this support were to transfer to Valencia en masse, it would still leave her some way off the frontrunners, but she would be transformed into a viable contender and would benefit from the well-oiled party machinery of traditional parties such as the centrist Partido Liberal (PL) and centre-right Partido Conservador (PC).

    The more moderate right and centrist coalition will hope that whichever candidate emerges from their consultation on 8 March will be able to pick up traction rapidly and overhaul De la Espriella when voters’ minds are more concentrated. However, he or she would only have just over two months to rally support among a disparate group of parties united only by their opposition to Petro and determination to prevent Cepeda from coming to power. As a corollary, if the victor in the consultation fails to make much of an impression on the polls, these parties could switch their support behind De la Espriella, despite some reservations, and could certainly be relied upon to do so should he make it through to a run-off against Cepeda, in order to thwart Petro.

    The established political class, much of which was prepared to cooperate with Petro at the outset of his term, with the PL and PC initially part of his grand coalition, now views him as a dangerous liability. It views him as having set Colombia onto a collision course with its powerful ally in the north due to his inability to subordinate ideological conviction to pragmatic diplomacy; as having threatened democracy by encouraging supporters to take to the streets to intimidate congress to approve his government’s reform agenda, and by constantly flirting with convening a constituent assembly to bypass institutional checks and balances; as having allowed the country to become overrun by drug trafficking through a failed ‘total peace’ initiative with the country’s illegal armed groups; and as having presided over a slump in investment due to his anti-fossil fuel policies and hostility to the private sector.

    For all these reasons, the establishment sees Cepeda as unpalatable even though his discourse is more moderate than Petro’s. The rise of De la Espriella, a charismatic lawyer with a strong social media presence, however, raises the prospect of a repeat of the 2022 election, in which the conservative establishment was muscled out by populist right-wing outsider Rodolfo Hernández, who lost to Petro in the second round. De la Espriella would bring his own brand of uncertainty and unpredictability. Centrist and right-of-centre parties thought they could contain and influence Argentina’s far-right president, Javier Milei, but he has kept them at arm’s length, taking their support and giving back little in return.

    US relations

    Points of agreement in the White House meeting between Presidents Petro and Trump are possible. There is scope, for instance, for a joint military strike on the Colombian guerrilla group Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN), much of which is based across the border in Venezuela. But given Trump’s propensity for interfering in regional electoral processes in favour of right-wing allies, there is a strong possibility of a return to the acrimonious exchanges which have characterised relations between Petro and Trump on social media.

    Cepeda

    Iván Cepeda has been deeply impacted by Colombia’s long-running internal armed conflict. His family was often in exile. His father, Manuel Cepeda Vargas, president and secretary general of the Partido Comunista Colombiano (PCC), was a senator for the far-left Unión Patriótica (UP) when he was killed by right-wing paramilitaries in August 1994. Iván Cepeda has campaigned for years in defence of human rights and to support the victims of the country’s political violence.  

  • THE BAHAMAS: PLP looking for a second term

    Patrick de Courcy 26 January 2026 Hits: 1055

    Date: By October 2026

    Type: General Election

    Main contenders: The Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) led by Prime Minister Philip ‘Brave’ Davis, the Free National Movement (FNM) led by Michael Pintard, and the Coalition of Independents (COI) led by Lincoln Bain.

    In 2021, the FNM government, led by then-prime minister Hubert Minnis, went to the polls eight months before it needed to and suffered a resounding 32-7 defeat in the 39-seat House of Assembly (now increased to 41 seats). The PLP doesn’t look as if it is going to take the same gamble in its search for a second consecutive term. And while in recent years The Bahamian electorate has shown itself to be fickle in its allegiances, given that it is as far back as March 1997 that a Bahamian government, the FNM under Hubert Ingraham, was granted a second term, the PLP will be hoping for a return to earlier times when it won six elections in a row from 1967-1992.

    The FNM’s decision to call the election early in 2021 may have been a self-inflicted wound, but it could not be blamed for the effects of Hurricane Dorian in September 2019 and then the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic in 2020 leading to a 14.5% contraction in the tourism-dependent economy. On the other hand, the electorate could and did blame the FNM government for its decision in 2018 to increase value-added tax (VAT) from 7.5% to 12%.

    The incoming Davis administration partly reversed this increase (dropping the rate to 10%). However, it also increased VAT on food from zero to 10% before dropping it back to 5% in 2025. Now, with an election looming, Davis has announced that VAT on food will be reduced to zero from 1 April. Interestingly, though, in its December 2025 Article IV Mission Concluding Statement, the IMF urged the government to raise VAT to 15% to help achieve the goal of reducing the debt-to-GDP ratio to 50% by FY2030/31. It currently stands at 74%.

    The PLP goes into election year with the economy in reasonably good shape, with projected growth for 2025 of 2.8% on the back of a 3.4% expansion in 2024. Unemployment dropped to 8.4% in 2024, although it edged up to 9.5% in 2025. Inflation is just 0.6%, down from an average 3.1% in 2023.

    Davis has already indicated that one of his main themes during the election campaign will be to question opposition leader Michael Pintard’s suitability for the role of prime minister, saying: “I have a simple question [for Michael Pintard]. What real job has he ever had? What has he ever built? What has he ever managed outside of press conferences and political complaints?”

  • BARBADOS: Mottley calls snap election

    Patrick de Courcy 26 January 2026 Hits: 1141

    Date: 11 February 2026

    Type: General Election

    Main contenders: The Barbados Labour Party (BLP), led by Prime Minister Mia Mottley; the Democratic Labour Party (DLP), led by Ralph Thorne.

    The BLP under Prime Minister Mia Mottley is seeking a third consecutive term after two successive clean sweep wins in 2018 and 2022. There is little reason to suppose that the DLP under the leadership of Ralph Thorne can bounce back sufficiently from its recent drubbings to gain power. Thorne, himself, was elected as a BLP member but crossed the floor after the 2022 election to become the DLP’s sole member of the House of Assembly and the party’s leader. One of the DLP’s problems is that there is little to distinguish it ideologically from the BLP, and, as far as personalities are concerned, Thorne cannot match Mottley’s charismatic appeal.

    This is the second time that Mottley has opted for an early election, having gone to the polls over a year early in 2022. On that occasion, what proved to be a triumphantly successful strategy was actually not without risk. The BLP had presided over a heavy economic contraction in 2020 as a result of the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic and minimal growth in 2021.

    The economic background this time is far more encouraging. 2022 saw a big post-pandemic bounce back in economic activity, with growth of 17.8%, to be followed by 4.1% in 2023 and 4.0% in 2024. Growth for 2025 is estimated to have been around 2.7%. Inflation was down to 1.4% in 2024, although it edged up to 2.3% in 2025. And debt, which was as high as 142.8% of GDP in 2017, is now down to around 100% and on target for the government’s goal of 60% of GDP by FY2035/36.

    One reason for Mottley’s decision to go for an early election will have been to catch the DLP off balance. Another reason, however, might have been the IMF’s warning at the time of its June 2025 review of the Barbados economic performance that while the economic outlook was stable, “risks to the outlook are tilted to the downside, amidst the highly uncertain external economic environment and Barbados’ continued vulnerability to global shocks and natural disasters”.

    A key point to watch in the election will be voter participation. Even if voters are not yet prepared to put the DLP back into government, a low turnout could suggest a growing disenchantment with politics, and the continuation of a worrying trend. Turnout of 60% in 2018 was slashed to 43% in 2022. 

  • BRAZIL: Lula guns for re-election, but not guaranteed

    Patrick de Courcy 26 January 2026 Hits: 1069

    Date: 4 October. Run-off for presidential and gubernatorial elections to be held on 25 October if no candidate receives over 50% of the valid votes in the first round.

    Type: Presidential, federal legislative elections (all 513 seats in the chamber of deputies and two thirds of the 81-member senate), gubernatorial, and state legislative elections.

    Main contenders: President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Partido dos Trabalhadores, PT); Senator Flávio Bolsonaro (Partido Liberal, PL); Ronaldo Caiado (União Brasil), the governor of Goiás state; Romeu Zema (Partido Novo), the governor of Minas Gerais state; Renan Santos (Missão); Aldo Rebelo (Democracia Cristã, DC).

    President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has been ranked in recent pre-election opinion surveys as the favourite to win re-election, although this does not necessarily indicate widespread public support for his administration. Several long-term social and political trends suggest a general shift to the right in Brazil, which means that opposition-aligned figures could have opportunities in the coming months to boost their popularity. However, the Brazilian right is currently disunited. Uncertainty remains as to whether Flávio Bolsonaro, the eldest son of former president Jair Bolsonaro (2019-2023), can present himself as a candidate who appeals to both far-right and centre-right voters.

    It is expected that Lula will sweep up the support of most left-wing and centre-left voters, just as he did in the 2022 presidential race. Despite concerns over the PT’s future, especially following its disappointing results in its north-eastern political strongholds during the 2024 municipal elections, Lula’s party has for decades been the dominant party of the Brazilian left, and its well-oiled campaigning machine will be behind his re-election bid. While the left has no strong alternative to Lula, several right-wing contenders have declared intentions to run for president. The list of presidential pre-candidates could change before October, as several prominent conservative figures may still throw their hat in the ring before April, with public officials such as mayors and governors needing to step down from their posts six months before the election if they plan to run for president.

    Currently, Flávio Bolsonaro appears to be the main candidate of the far-right populist ‘Bolsonarismo’ movement, but the name that has loomed over pre-election speculations for months has been Tarcísio de Freitas (Republicanos), the governor of Brazil’s wealthiest and most populous state, São Paulo. De Freitas’ name is often included in pre-election polls, despite his public denials of plans to run for president. He has instead insisted that he will run for another term as São Paulo’s governor. But political pundits have highlighted that De Freitas is one of the few names who is favoured by the markets, due to his pro-business stance and pushes for privatisation and spending cuts; who can appeal to moderate non-populist conservatives due to his relatively professional, pragmatic personal leadership style; and who could also win over supporters from the more radical Bolsonarismo movement, given his closeness to Bolsonaro himself.

    Bolsonaro legal woes

    De Freitas served as Bolsonaro’s infrastructure minister from 2019-2022 and has frequently expressed support for his former boss, especially during Bolsonaro’s legal woes last year. In September 2025, the supreme court (STF) found Bolsonaro guilty of plotting a coup d’etát in 2022 to overturn his election defeat to Lula. He is now serving a 27-year prison sentence with his son, Flávio, considered his proxy candidate. Rather than throwing their weight behind De Freitas, Bolsonaristas appear to be hoping that their torchbearer can emulate the political comeback of Lula, who was convicted on corruption charges in 2017 and was behind bars from 2018-2019. Despite being in prison, Lula declared plans to run in the 2018 presidential race, but ultimately his political protégé Fernando Haddad (the current finance minister) ended up running as his proxy and lost to Bolsonaro in the run-off in October 2018.

    Lula’s convictions were later overturned in 2021, clearing the way for his comeback in the presidential race the following year. There has been some speculation in the media that this is what Bolsonaro hopes to achieve – to have his conviction cleared or his sentence reduced so that he can run again in a future election, such as the 2030 or 2034 presidential race. Therefore, it might not matter much to Bolsonaro whether his son manages to defeat Lula. The main priority for the Bolsonarismo movement in the coming months may well be to keep the Bolsonaro family name in the national headlines and to keep the momentum behind Bolsonaro’s narrative that judicial authorities are persecuting him.

    Rallying cries of the right

    STF justice Alexandre de Moraes, the lead judge presiding over Bolsonaro’s coup plot trial, is one of the most reviled figures for the far right. Bolsonarista rallies in recent years have featured as much if not more vitriol directed at De Moraes than at Lula. The far-right hatred towards De Moraes is nothing new. During Bolsonaro’s presidency, the former president and his supporters frequently criticised and insulted De Moraes and other STF judges in public speeches and on social media. In 2022 De Moraes also served as the head of Brazil’s superior electoral court (TSE). Bolsonaristas painted him as the personification of Brazil’s supposedly tyrannical institutions, and they spread misinformation seeking to undermine the electoral process and push the argument that the 2022 election could have been stolen from Bolsonaro.

    It is unclear how much far-right ire will be directed at the current TSE president, STF justice Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha, given that she is considered a discreet figure who rarely makes public comments on divisive political topics. Media reports also indicate that Antunes Rocha will step down later this year before the October elections, leaving the TSE presidency to STF justice Kássio Nunes Marques, who was appointed to the judiciary by Bolsonaro in 2020. If a Bolsonaro nominee is leading the electoral authority, it is less likely that Bolsonaristas will criticise the TSE in the same way they did in 2022.

    However, the Bolsonarismo movement thrives on confrontation and portraying its leaders and members as victims oppressed by the establishment or the system. The 2018 and 2022 elections saw the Bolsonarismo movement tap into anti-establishment discontent and expand from a radical fringe movement to become a mainstay in Brazil’s political landscape. It is expected to remain a major political force in 2026 and beyond. Bolsonarismo will command a significant political estate, and if the movement wants to help Flávio stand a fighting chance against Lula, it will likely need to channel its energy towards drumming up rage against the incumbent government.

    The main issue that the Brazilian right could highlight is insecurity. Despite Brazil’s national homicide rate falling in recent years, the statistics do not correlate with a rising public feeling of safety. Instead, there is significant public appetite for tough-on-crime policies, rather than the holistic crime-fighting strategies advocated by security policy researchers, which involve better police intelligence to track and intercept the money laundering networks of criminal gangs and better community policing and poverty reduction initiatives to discourage young people in low-income communities from turning to a life of crime. This feeling of distrust towards the professional opinions of experts and increasing public preference for the supposed short-term fix of mass incarceration or tough police raids on gang-controlled areas could play into the hands of Bolsonarismo, which has often called for hardline measures.

    Lula and the Brazilian left more broadly have struggled to present a convincing counter-narrative against the sentiment of ‘bandido bom é bandido morto’ (the only good criminal is a dead criminal), a slogan that has been attributed to various politicians in the 20th century and has in recent decades become a common phrase in debates on social media especially among right-wing Brazilians. While it is unlikely that Lula’s campaign rhetoric will veer too strongly towards the hardline stance, he will likely try to highlight how his government is taking the fight against organised crime seriously.

    Economic outlook

    In addition to focusing more on security issues, Lula is expected to highlight the encouraging macroeconomic data for Brazil. The country’s unemployment rate in the rolling quarter of September-November 2025 fell to 5.2%, which is the lowest figure on record since 2012, when the national statistics institute (Ibge) began recording the metric in the current historical series. Ibge’s data also shows that annual inflation in 2025 stood at 4.26%, which is within the target range of 3.0% +/-1.5. Lula is less likely to be hit by anti-incumbent frustration if the public is feeling less anxiety over the cost of living and the job market is stronger.

    Regarding the economic outlook for Brazil and how it could affect consumer confidence and the public mood ahead of the election, it is worth noting that interest rates are still very high. As of January 2026, the benchmark interest rate (Selic) set by the BCB stood at 15.0%. Market analysts are expecting a rate-cut cycle at some point this year, although forecasts of private sector economists consulted by the BCB suggest that the Selic could still close this year at 12.25%. A decrease of a few percentage points in the Selic could bring consumers and businesses some sense of relief, but borrowing costs will still be high and there is unlikely to be a wave of increased consumer confidence and spending unleashed before October to lift the public mood.

    To boost his own popularity, Lula could implement a more generous fiscal policy, throwing cash around through social programmes, infrastructure projects, and subsidised credit. Right-wing figures could seek to reiterate their arguments that Lula and leftists more widely are irresponsible spendthrifts and that four more years of a Lula government could spell disaster for public finances. However, it is uncertain whether voters will care as much about potential fiscal profligacy if they feel improvements in their personal finances and living standards ahead of the election. Indeed, in 2022 Bolsonaro ramped up spending on welfare and social programmes, which was widely considered an effort to boost his re-election bid. He began 2022 as the underdog, with pre-election polls showing Lula as the strong favourite against the unpopular far-right firebrand, but the October 2022 run-off turned out to be a knife-edge vote, with Lula narrowly winning on 50.9%. It is debatable how much Bolsonaro’s generous fiscal stance in the final year of his presidency contributed to him coming so close to victory in 2022, but it could provide a lesson for Lula to apply in 2026.

    With the left clearly behind Lula, he and his campaign team will face a choice as to whether he should try to defeat Bolsonarismo by shoring up the support of his core left-wing voter bases or by making conciliatory gestures to win over centrist or centre-right voters. The 2022 election was regarded as a polarised contest in which many centrist voters ultimately chose Lula because they viewed him as the lesser of the two evils. In 2026 Lula could opt for boosting his left-wing credentials and riding the wave of polarisation to victory, but he will likely need to take care not to alienate moderates who lent him their support four years ago, especially centrist voters in Brazil’s densely populated south-eastern region, which includes states such as São Paulo, Minas Gerais, and Rio de Janeiro.

    Fragmented right

    The Brazilian left does not appear to have any strong option aside from Lula, whereas the right is currently divided between potential candidates representing various shades of conservatism. Despite some signals in 2025 of attempts to shore up ties between centre-right and far-right parties, it is uncertain if Flávio Bolsonaro will give up on his presidential bid in the coming months and endorse a right-of-centre candidate. Some far-right figures, such as Bolsonaro’s second son Carlos Bolsonaro, have publicly insulted moderate conservative governors, calling them “rats” and accusing them of trying to steal Bolsonaro’s political estate after his conviction. 

    Battle for congress

    In July 2025 Bolsonaro said at a rally that he wanted at least 50% of congress. Political pundits have highlighted how Brazil’s system of checks and balances places great power in the hands of lawmakers, and it is in congress that Bolsonaro would most likely hope for a way to reduce his sentence or be released from prison. Bolsonaro’s wife, Michelle Bolsonaro, and his second son, Carlos Bolsonaro, are expected to run for seats in the senate, the legislative chamber which handles the appointment of supreme court justices and can also launch proceedings to impeach a justice. 

    Strength of the centrão

    After the 2024 municipal elections, the parties that won the most mayorships were big tent parties such as the Partido Social Democrático (PSD), the Movimento Democrático Brasileiro (MDB), and other parties associated with the so-called ‘centrão’ (big centre), a loose grouping of parties which lean to the centre-right but are flexible in their political stances. The strength of the centrão in local politics does not necessarily mean that a centre-right figure would perform well in the presidential race, but local election results often correlate with federal congressional election results, which could suggest that the centrão is likely to continue dominating the national legislature.

  • HAITI: Will elections finally take place?

    Patrick de Courcy 26 January 2026 Hits: 958

    Date: First round 30 August 2026, second round 6 December 2026.

    Type: Presidential, legislative (119-member lower chamber and 30-seat senate), and municipal elections.

    Main contenders: Parti Haïtien Tèt Kale (PHTK), of assassinated former president Jovenel Moïse (2017-2021); Inité; Secteur Démocratique et Populaire National; Fanmi Lavalas (FL), of former president Jean-Bertrand Aristide (1991; 1994-1996; 2001-2004); Organisation du Peuple en Lutte (OPL), an FL splinter group; Fusion des sociaux-démocrates; among many others.

    Haiti has been mired in political, security, and constitutional crises for years, a situation exacerbated by the assassination of former president Jovenel Moïse (2017-2021) in July 2021. Since then, gangs have capitalised on the power vacuum at the top and now control over 90% of Port-au-Prince, and much of the country. Elections have not taken place since 2016 and Haiti has lacked democratically elected legislative officials since January 2023, when the terms of its last remaining 10 senators expired.

    Staging the vote is widely considered necessary to ending the protracted political transition in Haiti, which is currently governed by a transitional presidential council (CPT). Set up in April 2024 after the previous interim prime minister, Ariel Henry (2021-2024), was ejected amid unprecedented gang attacks, the CPT is tasked both with restoring security to Haiti and steering it towards elections – neither of which it has so far delivered on. The CPT’s mandate is due to end on 7 February 2026 – at which point elections were meant to have been held and a new president and legislature elected. However, this has not occurred, raising questions about what will happen beyond 7 February.

    In a move hailed as a breakthrough of sorts, however, on 1 December 2025 the CPT adopted a long-awaited electoral law. This came two weeks after the provisional electoral council unveiled a new electoral calendar, according to which the first round of presidential and legislative elections will take place on 30 August 2026, and the second round on 6 December 2026.

    Major questions persist however, not least the question of whether minimum levels of security will have been restored by August. Despite the approval by the United Nations (UN) Security Council in 2025 of the new beefed-up Gang Suppression Force (GSF) to replace the under-resourced Kenyan-led Multinational Security Support Mission (MSS), the security situation remains dire. On 1 October Volker Türk, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, said that over 16,000 people have been killed in armed violence in Haiti since January 2022.