24 April 2007
Hits: 291
The Andean region `remains on the brink of collapse, an outcome that would pose a serious threat to the US goal of achieving democracy, prosperity, and security in the hemisphere' — after the US had `over the past two decades […] spent billions of dollars and significant manpower to stem the flow of illegal drugs from the region northward; to assist local security forces in the fight against drugs, terror, and insurgency; and to promote free markets, human rights, and democratic consolidation.' This assessment comes from a hefty study commissioned from an independent commission by the Center for Preventive Action of the US-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).*
It says that the democracies of the region are at risk, because on top of the problems common to many developing countries, it faces acute `physical insecurity, due in some countries to ongoing or resurgent violent conflict, and in every country to the lack of state control over significant territory and to porous borders that enable the easy movement of drugs, arms, and conflict.'
The CFR study, Andes 2020, accepts from the outset that an increase in US funding for the region is unlikely, and notes that the Plan Colombia will have run its course by 2005. `In fact,' it says, `more money may not be the solution to the region's problems.'
The commission charged with preparing the report set itself the task of working out a strategy for after Plan Colombia. It states quite clearly that it is attempting `to redress what the Commission considers to be a major weakness of current US policy, as embodied in Plan Colombia and the Andean Counterdrug Initiative: too great an emphasis on counternarcotics and security issues, and too little emphasis on complementary, comprehensive, regional strategies.'
Three imperatives
Andes 2020 identifies three `imperatives designed to rectify the limitations of current policy':
-The need to diffuse and more equitably distribute political and economic resources and power in each country.
-Greater participation from the broader international community across the range of diplomatic, political, economic, social, security, and humanitarian issues in the region.
-The recognition that regional problems with regional impact require regional approaches, and that greater cooperation among the Andean countries is essential to successfully tackle shared challenges.
To that latter end, the study says, US policy can be more effectively organised to recognise the regional dimension of the Andean crisis, rather than sticking to a strictly bilateral, country-by-country approach.
Redressing the imbalance
To correct the overriding emphasis on counternarcotics and counterinsurgency objectives, the report recommends adopting a broader policy agenda, incorporating new priorities. Among these are:
-Political reforms to strengthen the rule of law and consolidate democratic institutions through increased accountability and transparency.
In this area the report identifies three strategic objectives for improving governance and security in the region. The first is major investment of financial and political resources in rural areas, with a commitment to strategic rural land reform. The second is increased engagement by the entire international community across the range of diplomatic, political, economic, and humanitarian issues at play in the region. Third is the development, both within the Andes and by the US and the international community, of regional approaches to regional problems.
-Sustainable rural and border development, including strategic land reform.
In this area the commission recommends the imposition and enforcement of property tax; acceleration of land titling and registry; and the enactment of strategic, market-assisted land reform in an accountable and transparent fashion. It also recommends that the Colombian government - with US assistance - halts the ongoing, coercive land grab by leftwing guerrillas, rightwing paramilitaries, and narcotraffickers, and that Colombia's asset forfeiture laws are effectively applied to ill-gotten land gains now in the hands of Colombia's illegal armed groups and drug traffickers.
-Trade and economic development, including increased access to markets and legitimate economic opportunities.
-A multilateral counterdrug policy that also addresses the issue of demand in consuming countries.
The drugs & security angle
The report does not advocate abandoning the counternarcotics and counterinsurgency elements of US policy towards the region. Rather, it states its belief that `the security environment in Colombia and the Andes is sufficiently vulnerable to merit continued US support', but as `one critical element of a broader policy agenda'.
As regards drugs, the commission proposes `a multilateral, multifaceted approach that combines financial incentives, broad international participation, and shared responsibility on both the supply and demand sides of the problem.' A key feature of this approach is the establishment of `a special development fund for drug cultivating countries, administered by the World Bank and sponsored by the major drug-consuming countries.' Among the other recommendations are the following:
-A coordinated regional assistance strategy by international donors.
-Targeted financial sanctions against narcotraffickers, paramilitaries, guerrillas, and their financial supporters.
-Greater human and financial resources to stem Colombia's humanitarian crisis.
On the security front, the report suggests `raising the current cap on the number of US military and contract personnel permitted to conduct training of Colombian armed forces, thereby accelerating their professionalisation.' This is to be complemented by `revising the current fixed ratio of military-to-civilian personnel, in order to offer the commander of the US Southern Command greater flexibility and discretion in directing the use of military and contract resources.'
Going regional
While advocating a regional rather than bilateral approach to the problems of the Andean region, the commission recognises that in many cases there are common problems where a crossborder approach is not viable. For these cases it makes a series of recommendations for actions that can be taken by individual states but are applicable to all of them. These include:
-Strengthening revenue-generating systems by cracking down on tax evasion, broadening the tax base, and moving toward a more progressive tax structure.
-Working together to negotiate an Andean Free Trade Area until the advent of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA).
-Forming an Andean customs union with reduced intra-regional tariff barriers.
-Taking greater action against the humanitarian crisis spilling over Colombia's borders.
-Expanding security cooperation between armed forces along border areas.
*Andes 2020: A New Strategy for the Challenges of Colombia and the Region. By an independent commission co-chaired by Daniel W Christman and John G Heimann. Published by the Council on Foreign Relations. Available as pdf from: www.cfr.org [This review has drawn from a copy of the proofs, so some references may not appear in the same form in the final version.]