Development: On 28 October the Fuerzas
Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (Farc) said that they were willing to enter
talks to negotiate a political solution to the conflict in Colombia.
Significance: After suffering a
series of crushing blows this year at the hands of Colombia's US-sponsored
military, the Farc is desperately in need of respite. “This letter is the
beginning of a written exchange to discuss the issues surrounding a political
end to the conflict, the humanitarian exchange and peace," said a statement posted by the Farc on pro-rebel website Anncol.
The declaration by the guerrilla group, dated October 16
(10 days before the escape on 26 October of Farc hostage and former politician
Óscar Tulio Lizcano), came as a response to a letter sent to the Farc on 11
September by a group of prominent Colombian intellectuals, politicians, former
Farc captives and journalists that requested a “humanitarian agreement" with the
guerrilla group. This letter foresaw the liberation of Farc hostages in exchange
for the release “at the opportune moment" of prisoners belonging to the Farc. It
is, however, far from clear whether the government will play ball, nor if the
Farc would be willing to cooperate directly with President Alvaro Uribe's centre-right administration.
This is not the first time that the Farc has offered to
negotiate a political end to the 44-year old conflict. Peace talks were held
with the group during the administrations of President Belisario Betancourt
(1982-1986) and Andrés Pastrana (1998-2002), which led to the creation of a
demilitarised 42,000sq km zone in Southern Colombia (known as Farclandia).
These, however, merely served to give the Farc breathing space, which it exploited to regroup, rearm and, ultimately, renew its attacks.
Nevertheless, the timing of the Farc's latest peace
offer is significant.
The Farc is arguably at its lowest ebb since
it was founded. Uribe's aggressive “Democratic Security" policy - propped up by
some US$5bn in military aid from the United States under the “Plan Colombia"
initiative - has subjected the guerrilla organization to a military onslaught
that has been relentless, well-planned and well-informed. While the Farc is
estimated to maintain an army of some 15,000, it is struggling to communicate
across its various fronts and it appears to be fractured. In 2008 it has
suffered several high profile desertions, the loss of three top commanders -
including Raúl Reyes, who was killed in a Colombian raid on a Farc camp inside
Ecuador on 1 March - and its founder and historic leader, Manuel Marulanda, or
Tirofijo, who died of a heart attack (also in March), and the rescue by the
military in July of a group of hostages which included what had been the Farc's
most valuable bargaining chip, the French-Colombian politician Ingrid Betancourt.
The escape last week of Lizcano, the Farc's longest held
political prisoner, with the help of his Farc captor Wilson Bueno Largo (known
as "Isaza") indicates the pressure that the organization is under. "Isaza", who
is to receive a reward of some US$500,000 from the Colombian government, said
that the Farc are “at this time very reduced as a group" and are facing “internal disintegration".
The significance of the peace offer is also increased by
the Farc's recent change of leadership. Following Marulanda's death in March,
Alfonso Cano assumed control of the organisation. Cano, a university-educated
ideologue, comes from the political rather than military wing of the Farc and
led the group's delegations to peace negotiations in Venezuela and Mexico in
1991 and 1992. These talks ultimately failed, but indicated Cano's openness to a political solution.
The Farc has also pointed to its unilateral release in
January of six former politicians, following negotiations with Piedad Córdoba,
an opposition senator who is heading this latest attempt at peace talks, and
Venezuela's President Hugo Chávez , as a sign of its “political goodwill".
However, the Colombian government's involvement may be a
sticking point in any future negotiations. The Farc has said that it is willing
to enter into talks brokered by the prominent Colombians who suggested the deal in September, but not with the government.
Meanwhile, Uribe has repeatedly refused in the past to
contemplate the creation of a demilitarized safe-zone to allow for the exchange
of prisoners and hostages, arguing that this would buy the Farc recovery time and emphasizing the success of Colombia's military operations.
If, however, a wholesale hostage release and peace
agreement is to be reached the Farc and the government will have to agree to
embark upon protracted negotiations; at the present time, this appears
unlikely.