Until yesterday Adán ran the government's controversial land reform programme, the Instituto Nacional de Tierras (Inti). Before that, he had been Hugo's private secretary and electoral strategist for the ruling Movimieno Quinta República. At the Inti, he antagonised the opposition and democrats by insisting that the national assembly could pass new laws even though the supreme court had ruled that the changes advocated were unconstitutional. Adán argued that as the national assembly was an autonomous institution it had the right to override the supreme court.
This line of reasoning is significant, because there are rumours that the government is musing over making its first changes to its Bolivarian constitution, in particular making it easier to appoint and fire supreme court justices and to simplify the appointment of the Consejo Nacional Electoral. The CNE will run elections and the referendum on whether Chávez should remain in office, should one ever be called. The national assembly has been unable to appoint the 15 people needed for the CNE: if the assembly fails to appoint them by the end of this week the supreme court will make the choice, though this raises all sort of constitutional questions.
The government has downplayed the idea of appointing supreme court justices and CNE commissioners by a simple majority, saying that the idea exists only in the minds of some of its supporters in congress. The amendment, proposed by a close Chávez ally in congress, Iris Varela, would replace the two-thirds majority needed in both cases with a simple majority. The significance of this is that the government has a majority, just, in the national assembly.
The appointment of Adán is a clear sign that the government is digging itself in. Adán is a self-confessed opponent of representative democracy, arguing that in Venezuela, at least, all it has produced is neo-liberalism and the impoverishment of the country. He claims that the Bolivarian constitution, introduced by Chávez , is a participative democracy but avowedly hostile to neoliberalism and individualism and tending towards collectivism.
End of preview - This article contains approximately 390 words.
Subscribers: Log in now to read the full article
Not a Subscriber?
Choose from one of the following options
