Lula was opening a seminar on the role of legislators in creating the FTAA.
Peter Allgeier, the number two to the US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick,
is due to address the meeting before it closes today. Representatives from 22
countries eligible for the FTAA are attending the seminar.
Lula said that Brazil was prepared to make concessions to achieve the FTAA, but
said that it was increasingly clear that the US was not prepared to compromise.
The US, he said, had made it clear that neither agricultural subsidies nor
anti-dumping rules would be included in the FTAA. This, he said, created
limitations. If the US would not open up its markets in areas where Brazil was
competitive, such as agriculture, the US could not expect easier access to
Brazilian markets in the areas in which it was interested.
He added that Brazil was keen on increasing its foreign trade and clearly
would like preferential access to the US market. This ambition, he said, had to
be balanced by Brazil's position as the biggest economy in South America, which
meant that it had to speak up for the poorer countries in the region.
Lula's speech was a clear and important statement of Brazilian policy on the
FTAA. The signals coming out of Brazil have been confused in recent weeks
because of high-handedness by Itamaraty, the foreign ministry. This reached a
peak at the meeting of officials in Trinidad & Tobago at the beginning of
October when Itamaraty produced a document which other Brazilian ministers and
some of Brazil's partners in Mercosul claimed represented a new departure for
policy on the FTAA. This policy, the dissidents warned, would lead to Brazil
becoming isolated over the FTAA.
Itamaraty's hostility to the US alarmed and annoyed some powerful lobbies
inside, who feared that Brazil was going to miss an opportunity. Lula clarified
a new multi-layer strategy announced by Itamaraty in Trinidad. He pointed out
that it was a development of Mercosul/Aladi policy. Aladi was the weak Latin
American effort at regional integration under which members offered each other
preferential access to their domestic markets. The new Itamaraty idea is that
individual countries can open up their markets bilaterally, but do not have to
extend the same access to all members of the FTAA. In a shrewd attempt to ensure
that Uruguay, which has shown signs of wanting to break with Brazil on the FTAA,
stayed with it, Lula said that Brazil shared Uruguay's view that the FTAA should
not be imposed.
Lula clarified the way FTAA policy would be set for Brazil. He said that
Itamaraty would continue to coordinate the negotiations but it would consult
widely with other interested parties, both from the official sector and the
private sector. Day-to-day negotiations over the FTAA would be coordinated by
Itamaraty but with input from the agriculture and development ministers.
Lula and his ministers deny that the country has been isolated over the FTAA.
They point out that Argentina backs Brazil and Mercosul. José Dirceu, Lula's
right-hand man and chief of staff, said that he did not believe that the US had
been trying to isolate Brazil. He said that this was impossible because of
Brazil's importance and size.
This is in marked contrast with what the US has been doing in Central America.
There it has warned countries negotiating a free-trade deal with the US that
they must break with the Brazilian-led `G-flux' group. This was created at the
World Trade Organization meeting in Cancún, led by Brazil, China and India, to
act as a counterweight to the US and the European Union.
End of preview - This article contains approximately 663 words.
Subscribers: Log in now to read the full article
Not a Subscriber?
Choose from one of the following options