THE BAHAMAS: Dodging the bullets, for now
Just weeks before The Bahamas was spared the worst attentions of Hurricane Irma, Moody’s ratings agency refrained from stigmatising the country with another downgrade. Both were near misses, and Moody’s has put The Bahamas on notice that any significant economic underperformance will have consequences. Luckily Irma does not appear to have caused any major damage to the country’s all-important tourism infrastructure.
The main problem for the newish Free National Movement (FNM) government led by Dr Hubert Minnis is the fiscal chaos it inherited from the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) administration that it ousted on 10 May. In an address to the nation on 26 July, Prime Minister Minnis said that “five years of gross mismanagement and incompetence” by the PLP government had left the country struggling to ward off another downgrading by the international credit-rating agencies. The country’s sovereign credit rating had been downgraded by Moody’s in August 2016, from Baa2 to Baa3, with Standard & Poor’s marking it down to sub-investment-grade level in December 2016.
The prime minister backed up this warning by announcing that spending in certain ministries was to be cut by 10%, that he would institute a hiring freeze, and that no contracts exceeding US$100,000 would be renewed. A special committee to advise on state-owned enterprises would be appointed.
Finance Minister Peter Turnquest revealed that while the previous government had projected a fiscal deficit of US$100m the actual figure would be more than US$500m. He said that the government would have to borrow US$722m in order to cover the fiscal deficit and to finance the government’s commitments for the upcoming fiscal year.
Three weeks before the prime minister’s address to the nation, Moody’s had announced that it was putting The Bahamas’ Baa3 rating on review for a downgrade. Announcing the review, Moody’s said: “The decision to place the ratings on review was prompted by official statements that the Bahamas' fiscal position was weaker than previously estimated and that the government's debt ratios will continue to worsen over the coming years. This diverged from Moody's expectation that the government's debt ratios would stabilize in fiscal 2017, thus supporting the Bahamas' Baa3 rating and stable outlook.”
Topically, given the glancing blow from Hurricane Irma, Moody’s referred back to the damage done by Hurricane Matthew in October 2016 as a contributory reason for the review. It said that costs associated with rebuilding work was one of the reasons for additional fiscal slippage during the election year. It said: “The Bahamas' government debt/GDP ratio has risen to an estimated 72% of GDP in 2016/17 from 55% in 2012/13. This is higher than Moody's previous expectation that the debt ratio would stabilize below 70% of GDP, given a recovering, albeit still weak, economy.”
On 25 August, Moody’s announced that the result of the review was a reprieve, based on the fact that “The Bahamas' credit metrics remain in line with Baa3 peers, with GDP revisions supporting an improvement in quantitative metrics”.
The agency argued: “The authorities anticipate a substantial reduction in the deficit this year, compared to the deficit for FY 2016/17, which Moody's estimates was around 7% of GDP. Last year's deficit was elevated due in good part to one-offs related to reconstruction costs after Hurricane Matthew and election-related spending. For the current fiscal year, official projections place the deficit closer to 2% of GDP. Even though Moody's anticipates a more gradual deficit reduction, our projections indicate the deficit could be consistent with values we estimate would stem the upward trend in debt ratios during previous years.”
However, despite the reprieve, Moody’s maintained the negative outlook on the grounds of “potential downside risks to the fiscal consolidation process posed by weaker-than-expected growth, exposure to climate-related shocks in the form of hurricanes, and implementation risks associated with measures to rein in expenditure growth and enhance revenues”.
At the time, Moody’s wasn’t to know that Hurricane Irma was less than two weeks away from potentially fulfilling its gloomy warming about climate-change risks. Hurricane Irma raged into Bahamian waters as a Category 5 hurricane on 7 September and smashed into Ragged Island in the southeast. Ragged Island has a population of around 70 people, 50 of whom were evacuated before the storm hit. The other islands in the southeast affected were Mayaguana, Inagua, Crooked Island, Acklins, and Long Cay, but the damage to these seems to have been relatively light, and the rest of the archipelago, including the main population centres and tourist resorts, were not hit directly.
A policeman on Inagua reported that the island had been “very, very lucky”. There was “some roof damage” and about 20 utility poles were down, but there were no injuries or loss of life, and the airstrip was undamaged. Crooked Island residents reported much the same experience: some roofing and building damage, but the airport was undamaged.
Hurricane Irma
Hurricane Irma caused severe, and in places catastrophic, damage in the Caribbean as it transited Antigua & Barbuda, St Kitts & Nevis, Anguilla, Saint Martin/Sint Maarten, and the British and US Virgin Islands. It also caused damage to Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, and Haiti as it passed to the north of these islands. The Bahamas evacuated six of its southerly islands ahead of the hurricane. The German-based Centre for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM) assessed the likely level of damages as follows: SKN, US$80m; St Barts, US$780M; Saint Martin/Maarten, US$2.5bn; Antigua & Barbuda US$215m; Anguilla, US$290m; US Virgin Islands, $2.4bn; British Virgin Islands, US$1.4bn; Puerto Rico, US$800m.
PLP continues to struggle
As The Bahamas’ FNM government struggles with the legacy bequeathed to it by the PLP, the PLP itself is struggling with the consequences of losing power and the damage done to its reputation by serious allegations of corruption against leading members of the party. In the 10 May general election, the PLP’s representation was reduced to just four seats. Arguably as serious as the loss of political power is the damage done to its reputation by the arrest of three former PLP members of parliament. Two former cabinet ministers, Shane Gibson (former labour minister) and Kenred Dorsett (former environment minister), have been charged with various bribery and extortion offences, along with Frank Smith, another former MP who was head of the Public Hospitals Authority.
The new leader of the PLP, Philip Brave Davis, maintains that the men are the victims of a witch hunt, but he cannot deny the seriousness of the crisis for the PLP. He has called a party convention for 22-25 October at which he is hoping to begin the fightback. Talking about the significance of the convention, Davis said: “It is to remove any doubts as to where the party wants to go and in determining leadership to assist in crafting the way forward.”
