Development: On 7 April US President George W Bush sent his free-trade
agreement (FTA) with Colombia to Congress.
Significance: The chances of the Democrat-controlled Congress
approving the FTA are very slim. Senior Democrats immediately declared they
could not support the trade deal for three reasons: first, because President
Bush is trying to fast-track the bill through Congress; secondly, because they
believe that now is not the time to be risking US jobs with the economy
teetering on the edge of a recession; and thirdly, because they don't believe
that Colombia's human-rights record entitles it to such a deal.
Under the fast-track arrangement, Congress has 90 working days to approve the
FTA, which was signed by Bush and his Colombian counterpart Alvaro Uribe in
February 2006. Upon sending the FTA to Congress Bush said the bill should be
passed as soon as possible: "The need for this agreement is too urgent -
the stakes for our national security are too high - to allow this year to end
without a vote", the president declared.
Although Bush said that the deal would be good for US business since it would
reduce Colombian trade barriers for US exports, this isn't the urgency he was
talking about. For Bush, the Colombia FTA has considerable strategic
significance: the president is worried about the message Congress would be
sending to the US's largest ally in South America by rejecting the FTA. "If
Congress fails to approve this agreement, it would not only abandon a brave
ally, it would send a signal throughout the region that America cannot be
counted on to support its friends."
Bush praised Uribe for two achievements in particular: confronting the
Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (Farc) and standing up to Bush's
nemesis in the region, Venezuela's President Hugo Chávez . "We can provide
a powerful rebuke to dictators and demagogues in our backyard," Bush
concluded. The US president also stressed that approving the FTA would help the
Colombian government combat the drugs trade.
The Democrats immediately said that Bush had made a major mistake by
introducing the trade deal to Congress. Interestingly, their chief complaint was
not about Colombia and its rights record but concerned Bush's attempts to
fast-track the bill, which they say displays a lack of respect for the
legislature. Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid complained that:
"By thumbing his nose at the basic processes that underlie Congress'
willingness to extend fast-track authority to a president, President Bush is
dealing a serious blow to US trade policy for years to come."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman
Charlie Rangel issued a joint statement explaining why they could not support
the Colombia pact "under present circumstances". They said Bush's
"unprecedented decision to send a free trade agreement to Congress without
following established protocols of Congressional consultation is
counter-productive, jeopardizing prospects for its passage". They then
complained about the president's "apparent disregard for the economic
insecurity faced by millions of struggling Americans".
Finally, Pelosi and Rangel questioned whether Uribe had so far done enough to
deserve an FTA. Previously Pelosi and Rangel have been quick to slam Uribe's
rights record, but on this occasion they were more diplomatic. "Despite
progress made by President Uribe, Colombia remains a dangerous place to be a
labour activist, and for those who commit these acts of violence, there is
little threat of prosecution or punishment. Sustained progress on the ground
remains a prerequisite for our support," Pelosi and Rangel said. The two
pointed out that they had supported Colombia's economy by twice passing the
Andean Trade Preference Extension Act.
The bill is expected to spend 60 working days in the House of Representatives
and 30 days in the Senate. Democrats control the Senate by 51-49 and the House
by 233 to 198, meaning that the White House and Colombia will have their work
cut out if they are to persuade sufficient Democrats to support the deal.
Colombia's efforts have hardly been helped by the fact Uribe recently sacked the
public relations firm, Burson-Marsteller, which was promoting the deal on
Capitol Hill.
Uribe took the decision after the head of Burson-Marsteller, Mark Penn,
described his meeting with Colombia's ambassador to the US, Carolina Barco, as
an "error of judgement that will not be repeated". Penn resigned from
his position as chief strategist to Democrat presidential hopeful, Hillary
Clinton, soon afterwards. Both Clinton and the other Democrat challenger, Barack
Obama, are staunchly opposed to the Colombia FTA.