Development: Roberto Barbery, the minister for participación popular,
and the prefect of Santa Cruz, Carlos Hugo Molina, resigned on 27 January, on
the eve of Santa Cruz's declaration of autonomy.
Significance: Barbery said that he had to go because he was the
minister responsible for boosting local democracy and he had to take
responsibility for the situation in Santa Cruz. The prefect resigned because he
said that he felt he was a hindrance to negotiations between the government and
the secessionists in Santa Cruz. Significantly, both Barbery and Molina are
Cruceños.
The resignations came as the government made three major concessions to the
secessionist Comité pro Santa Cruz. First, it agreed to chop another two cents
off the price of diesel, bringing the price back to US$0.43 a litre; secondly
the government agreed that prefects should be directly elected; and thirdly that
the Cruceños could hold their referendum about autonomy before the constituent
assembly.
The big question for today is how the rally and then the proclamation of an
interim government for the department of Santa Cruz goes. The Comité pro Santa
Cruz wants the event to be peaceful and large: it is hoping for 300,000 people
to turn up to the rally.
On 27 January, 5,000 people opposed to the Comité, which they described as
"fascist", demonstrated against the autonomists. The
anti-secessionists were led by peasant, Indian, teachers and human-rights
organisations. The main anti-autonomy organisation in Santa Cruz is the
Coordinadora de Pueblos Etnicos de Santa Cruz (CPESC). It claims that the
Comité does not represent anything like all the people in Santa Cruz.
The Comité claims to speak for 400 organisations: its critics say that it is
dominated by agribusiness interests. The CPESC and its allies pointed out that
the Comité's decision to take over the land reform agency, INRA, in the city of
Santa Cruz would slow the process of resettling landless peasants on unworked
parts of big estates.
The department of Santa Cruz is the biggest and richest of Bolivia's nine
departments. Its successful agribusinesses have been drawing migrants from other
parts of the country. This is highlighting the racial divisions in the
department: the incomers tend to be Indians from the highlands while established
Cruceño families are proud of their European origins.
The local opponents of the Comité claim that it is backed by the energy
companies which do not want the federal government to reform the hydrocarbons
law. The Comité rejects the accusation that it is financed by the energy
companies as twaddle.
Neo-Conservatives in the US, who are now in the ascendant in US foreign
policy making, welcome the break up of Bolivia. Mark Falcoff wrote an
influential article in the American Enterprise Institute's 'Latin American
Outlook' in June 2004 in which he argued that the partitioning of Bolivia would
be a good thing. Santa Cruz would become a gas and agribusiness economy, while
the highlands would be coca-dependent.
It is not clear whether the Comité is advocating secession: the Comité said
that it will organise a referendum on what degree of autonomy Santa Cruz should
have. The very fact that the Comité is doing this without reference to the
federal government shows that it wants to be pretty autonomous. The Comité has
pre-empted the federal government, which had wanted to call a constituent
assembly in May to reform the constitution and decide on what degree of autonomy
the departments should have.