COLOMBIA: Deep polarisation to squeeze out moderates
Date: 31 May. If no presidential candidate secures an absolute majority of the valid votes in the first round, a second round run-off will be held on 21 June.
Type: Presidential and congressional. Congressional elections will be held on 8 March for the lower chamber of congress and senate.
Main contenders: Iván Cepeda (ruling left-wing coalition Pacto Histórico); Abelardo De la Espriella (far-right Defensores de la Patria); Sergio Fajardo (centrist Dignidad y Compromiso). One candidate to emerge from a consultation being held concurrently with congressional elections to represent the Gran Consulta por Colombia coalition from Senator Paloma Valencia (right-wing Centro Democrático [CD]); Juan Carlos Pinzón (unaffiliated); Juan Daniel Oviedo (unaffiliated); Aníbal Gaviria (centrist Partido Liberal [PL]); Juan Manuel Galán, centrist Nuevo Liberalismo; David Luna, right-of-centre Cambio Radical [CR]); Vicky Dávila (unaffiliated); and Mauricio Cárdenas, centre-right Partido Conservador [PC]).
Colombia will hold potentially its most consequential elections in a generation on 31 May. Much the same could have been written ahead of the 2022 contest which saw the country’s first genuine left-wing candidate, Gustavo Petro, a former M-19 guerrilla, come to power. Petro’s victory and the challenge he posed to the political establishment ultimately pushed most right-wing and centrist parties to form an electoral alliance to try and prevent his continuity candidate (Petro is constitutionally barred from seeking re-election), Senator Iván Cepeda, from succeeding him. But they risk being outflanked by a media-savvy far-right populist, Abelardo De la Espriella, who has shot to prominence.
There is a huge amount at stake. President Petro’s combative rhetoric has seen him engage in spiralling spats on social media with US President Donald Trump, upending years of close bilateral diplomatic relations. This was thrown into sharp relief by the US military operation to seize Venezuela’s leader Nicolás Maduro on 3 January, after which Trump publicly mooted intervention in Colombia, telling Petro to “watch his ass”. Colombia now finds itself in a new geopolitical reality with a more muscular US bent on reassertion of its primacy in the region, rewarding ideological allies, such as Argentina’s President Javier Milei and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, and wielding the big stick for those that do not share this affinity. Against this backdrop and with the two frontrunners, Cepeda and De la Espriella, situated on either extreme of the political spectrum, these elections eclipse those of 2022 in significance for Colombia and its future.
Clearly concerned that the prospect of his suffering the same fate as Maduro might not be as far-fetched as it would have seemed, Petro put in a call to Trump to try and defuse tensions on 7 January and they spoke for over an hour. Trump said he appreciated the gesture and the two heads of state even agreed to meet in the White House (a date of 3 February was subsequently agreed), but even if this goes comparatively well, relations could still sour in the months ahead, especially if Cepeda falls back in the polls and Petro suspects US electoral interference in favour of his right-wing rivals.
Cepeda enjoyed a decent lead in electoral surveys published in late 2025 but in the most recent survey, by AtlasIntel, carried out in the days following the US military operation in Venezuela, De la Espriella moved ahead, polling 28% to 26.5% for Cepeda. While they were separated by little, the survey projected an emphatic victory for De la Espriella over Cepeda in a likely second round on 21 June of 44.2% to 34.9%.
A separate survey released a week later by Spanish pollster GAD3 suggested Cepeda retained an advantage over De la Espriella of 30%-22% and would defeat him in a run-off by 40%-32%. The sample was smaller, however, with only some 1,200 respondents compared with over 4,500 in the AtlasIntel poll. Where both polls agreed was that nobody else is in contention – for now. AtlasIntel had Sergio Fajardo, a centrist former mayor of Medellín and former governor of Antioquia, in third place on 9.4% followed by Senator Paloma Valencia, of the right-wing Centro Democrático (CD), and Juan Carlos Pinzón, a former defence minister and ambassador to the US, tied in fourth on 5.1%. The GAD3 poll had the third-place candidate, Valencia, even further adrift on 3%.
The race could still be shaken up by developments on 8 March, however, when the Gran Consulta por Colombia coalition will hold a consultation featuring eight candidates ranging from the centre to the right of the spectrum. Both surveys suggested that Valencia is the favourite to emerge triumphant in this contest. If the support for the other seven candidates predominantly transferred to her afterwards, she would shoot up the polls.
Together with Pinzón’s support, Valencia would reach 10.2% and while none of the other candidates competing in the consultation polled more than 1.8% in the AtlasIntel survey, for instance, altogether their combined support comes to 6.4%, bringing a grand total of 16.6%. Even if all of this support were to transfer to Valencia en masse, it would still leave her some way off the frontrunners, but she would be transformed into a viable contender and would benefit from the well-oiled party machinery of traditional parties such as the centrist Partido Liberal (PL) and centre-right Partido Conservador (PC).
The more moderate right and centrist coalition will hope that whichever candidate emerges from their consultation on 8 March will be able to pick up traction rapidly and overhaul De la Espriella when voters’ minds are more concentrated. However, he or she would only have just over two months to rally support among a disparate group of parties united only by their opposition to Petro and determination to prevent Cepeda from coming to power. As a corollary, if the victor in the consultation fails to make much of an impression on the polls, these parties could switch their support behind De la Espriella, despite some reservations, and could certainly be relied upon to do so should he make it through to a run-off against Cepeda, in order to thwart Petro.
The established political class, much of which was prepared to cooperate with Petro at the outset of his term, with the PL and PC initially part of his grand coalition, now views him as a dangerous liability. It views him as having set Colombia onto a collision course with its powerful ally in the north due to his inability to subordinate ideological conviction to pragmatic diplomacy; as having threatened democracy by encouraging supporters to take to the streets to intimidate congress to approve his government’s reform agenda, and by constantly flirting with convening a constituent assembly to bypass institutional checks and balances; as having allowed the country to become overrun by drug trafficking through a failed ‘total peace’ initiative with the country’s illegal armed groups; and as having presided over a slump in investment due to his anti-fossil fuel policies and hostility to the private sector.
For all these reasons, the establishment sees Cepeda as unpalatable even though his discourse is more moderate than Petro’s. The rise of De la Espriella, a charismatic lawyer with a strong social media presence, however, raises the prospect of a repeat of the 2022 election, in which the conservative establishment was muscled out by populist right-wing outsider Rodolfo Hernández, who lost to Petro in the second round. De la Espriella would bring his own brand of uncertainty and unpredictability. Centrist and right-of-centre parties thought they could contain and influence Argentina’s far-right president, Javier Milei, but he has kept them at arm’s length, taking their support and giving back little in return.
US relations
Points of agreement in the White House meeting between Presidents Petro and Trump are possible. There is scope, for instance, for a joint military strike on the Colombian guerrilla group Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN), much of which is based across the border in Venezuela. But given Trump’s propensity for interfering in regional electoral processes in favour of right-wing allies, there is a strong possibility of a return to the acrimonious exchanges which have characterised relations between Petro and Trump on social media.
Cepeda
Iván Cepeda has been deeply impacted by Colombia’s long-running internal armed conflict. His family was often in exile. His father, Manuel Cepeda Vargas, president and secretary general of the Partido Comunista Colombiano (PCC), was a senator for the far-left Unión Patriótica (UP) when he was killed by right-wing paramilitaries in August 1994. Iván Cepeda has campaigned for years in defence of human rights and to support the victims of the country’s political violence.