With opinion surveys frequently showing violence and crime as among the top public concerns in Chile, it was unsurprising that discussion about security proposals dominated the first televised presidential debate on 10 September. The current frontrunners for the presidency, the far-right José Antonio Kast (Partido Republicano, PR) and the left-wing Jeannette Jara (Partido Comunista de Chile, PCCh), presented vastly different views on how to reduce crime and also clashed on issues such as migration, which right-wing candidates state is a factor that has driven up crime rates.
Election polls in September indicated a neck-and-neck race ahead of the first-round vote on 16 November. National pollster Cadem carried out a survey on 12 September which showed Jara, the candidate for the ruling left-wing coalition, polling on 26% of voter intentions, while Kast polled on 25%. The current third-place candidate, Evelyn Matthei, of the right-wing Unión Demócrata Independiente (UDI), polled on 18%, followed by the right-wing populist Franco Parisi (Partido de la Gente, PDG) on 11%, and the far-right libertarian Johannes Kaiser (Partido Nacional Libertario, PNL) on 8%.
While Jara led the polling figures for the first round of the election, the survey responses for second-round voting intentions suggest that Chileans could lean towards a right-wing candidate with more hardline security proposals. In a projected head-to-head between Jara and Kast, 32% of respondents said they would vote for Jara and 43% chose Kast. Between Jara and Matthei, 31% of respondents chose the left-wing candidate while 45% said they could vote for Matthei, the representative of Chile’s main right-wing coalition, Chile Vamos.
Eight candidates participated in the presidential debate on 10 September, which was broadcast by national TV network Chilevisión. In addition to Jara, Kast, Matthei, Parisi, and Kaiser, three independent candidates are also competing: Marco Enríquez-Ominami, a former legislator for the left-of-centre Partido Socialista (PS) who has since left the party; Eduardo Artés, the former leader of the far-left Unión Patriótica (UPA); and Harold Mayne-Nicholls, a journalist and former head of the national professional football association (ANFP) and football federation (FFCh), who has framed his presidential campaign on calls for dialogue and moderation amid a polarised political climate.
This was the first debate since the start of the official campaign period on 18 August, and the most heated discussions were on issues such as crime, insecurity, and migration. Kast argued that the way to reduce crime was to crack down migration and close the borders. He also called for the creation of a special prison for foreign criminals, stating migrants convicted of a crime should complete their full sentence in Chile before being deported.
Other right-wing candidates expressed similar anti-migration views. Parisi said that the situation at the country’s northern border was a “disaster” and proposed planting landmines on the border to deter migrants. Matthei agreed that illegal immigration was a problem and that border security should be tightened, but said that foreign convicts should be sent back to their countries of origin to serve their sentences. She also said there was no silver bullet for eradicating crime in Chile, diverging with Kast’s emphasis on closing the borders and expelling migrants as the main solution to lowering crime rates.
Meanwhile, Jara said that she would do what was done by right-wing former president Sebastián Piñera (2010-2014, 2018-2022) during both his terms, which was to boost the technological capabilities at the borders to identify and register migrants. She said that while “some may believe that digging trenches or even laying antipersonnel or antitank mines is going to solve this”, the length of the northern border, which stretches well over 800km, meant that “technology” was the answer. Jara’s praise for the actions taken under the previous right-wing administration of Piñera could suggest that she is trying to appeal to a broader voter base and avoid being seen as too left-wing.
Jara was also keen to refute claims that she was going to “regularise” the status of 200,000 illegal migrants, saying Kast had spread this false claim in his campaign material. During the debate Kast insisted on this point, asking Jara why an illegal immigrant should have the same access to public services as a native-born Chilean. Jara replied that what she was proposing was the process of ‘empradonamiento’ (registration) or collecting information about migrants, which is an action that she said was already being carried out and was a key step towards addressing the issue of illegal migration and putting things in order; she denied that it was a question of who gets priority access to public services.
Throughout the debate, Jara appeared to receive the most direct attacks from other candidates. Given that she is the candidate backed by the left-wing government of President Gabriel Boric (Frente Amplio, FA), candidates on both the left and right of the political spectrum can use her to criticise what they perceive to be the failings of the incumbent administration and highlight what they would change. According to the Cadem poll on 12 September, 55% of survey respondents believed that Jara received the most attacks from other debate participants, while 34% said Kast was the most attacked.
Other left-wing candidates on the stage sought to differentiate themselves from Jara by arguing that the Chilean State has failed to provide good services and raise living standards for local communities. Enríquez-Ominami said that Jara has not engaged in any “self-criticism” and argued that where the State is absent, the “narcos” step in.
Artés said that crime prevention must be “in the hands of the people” and that a policing approach that can truly address insecurity would need a strong emphasis on community engagement rather than what he argued was police “being deployed from barracks” and committing acts of repression. Artés also criticised the Boric administration for its continuation of states of exception in the south of the country, comparing the current status quo of militarised security responses to the Pacification of the Araucanía, Chile’s violent occupation of the lands of the indigenous Mapuche people in the mid-to-late 19th century. The moderate, centrist independent candidate, Mayne-Nicholls, also emphasised crime prevention instead of a militarised response.
Parisi defended the militarised approach in the south, saying that the country needs more troop deployments. “We need military personnel on the streets, just as in the [southern region of] Araucanía.” He also called for more enforcement of Chile’s antiterrorism law. Meanwhile, Kaiser sought to differentiate himself from other right-wing candidates by saying that he was the only candidate who was stressing judicial reform as the answer to reducing crime rates.
The one right-wing candidate who seemed to portray herself as more moderate was Matthei. “We need to have better intelligence, better financial intelligence, we need to control our ports and airports,” Matthei said. This overlapped with Jara’s arguments that the key to tackling organised crime was to investigate illicit cash flows and “lift banking secrecy to follow dirty money”. This approach suggests that Matthei is trying to appeal to the more centrist right-wing vote, in opposition to the polarisation posed by Kast. While Matthei has been gaining ground in the polls, it appears she still has some work to do if she is to make it into the second round in December.
Jara and Kast rejection rates
A week after the televised debate, Cadem carried out another survey on 17 September in which it asked respondents how firm they were in their voting intentions. The poll showed that Jeannette Jara and José Antonio Kast had the largest portion of voters who have already firmly decided to vote for them in November, but they also had the highest rejection rates. When asked if they would vote for Jara, 25% of respondents expressed firm support while 60% expressed firm rejection, stating they would definitely not vote for her. Regarding Kast, 24% said they had already made up their minds to vote for him and 50% said they were firmly opposed to voting for him.
Gun control
In the debate on 10 September, the candidates were asked who owned a firearm, and José Antonio Kast was the only one who said he had a gun at home, although he did not go on to call for loosening gun control. Instead, he said that he wanted to boost the firepower of police forces. Johannes Kaiser said that access to guns should be facilitated for law-abiding citizens and restricting legal gun ownership would not address the problem of illegal arms trafficking. Jeannette Jara disagreed with Kaiser and claimed that over half of the guns confiscated by police are licenced firearms, suggesting that authorities should be concerned about crimes committed by legal gun owners as well.