Region: IMF and Eclac agree that things are slow
The United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America & The Caribbean (ECLAC), followed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), revised down economic expectations for the region in their respective Spring forecast updates, released in April.
ECLAC went first on 7 April, forecasting an overall annual contraction of 0.6% this year for the region, following on from its estimated contraction of 0.5% last year. The commission said its new, weaker forecast was evidence of “the difficult global scenario, in which low growth continues in developed countries, there is a significant deceleration in emerging economies (China in particular), increasing volatility and costs in financial markets, and low prices for commodities – especially hydrocarbons and minerals”. “In addition”, it added, “there is greater weakness in internal demand in the region’s countries, with the decline in domestic investment accompanied by a deceleration of consumption.”
As last year, there is a marked North-South discrepancy in the performance, with Mexico and Central America doing better than the Southern Cone, which is now suffering the triple whammy of deep recessions in Brazil and Venezuela and the continued oil and commodity price rout. As such, growth in Central America and Mexico in 2016 is forecast at 2.6% year-on-year, below the 2.9% registered in 2015, reflecting a slightly weaker performance in Mexico. In Central America too however, ECLAC also forecasts slower growth, of 3.9% year-on-year, compared to the decent 4.3% registered in 2015, when the sub-region enjoyed a rebound based on the US recovery and the strong fiscal benefit of reduced oil import costs. However, with US growth steady but not markedly increasing, and European and Chinese growth still in uncertain territory, coming months look to be less dynamic for the region.
Meanwhile, South America will register a contraction of 1.9% in 2016, with Brazil a major drag. Noting the cumulative impact of fiscal adjustments this year in several regional countries, ECLAC notes that efforts should be made “to protect the social gains achieved in recent years and avoid rollbacks in the face of a lower economic growth scenario. In this context, it suggests that countries “need policies that sustain social and productive investment in the framework of smart fiscal adjustments”. Regional finances, it says, need to be made sustainable with “policies that take into account the impact on growth capacity in the long term, as well as the social conditions of the region's inhabitants”. And in support of this, ECLAC repeats its well-worn mantra about the need to stimulate investment and increase productivity “so as to resume a path of sustained and sustainable growth in the long term”.
Meanwhile, the IMF a week later said that Latin America and the Caribbean would post an overall contraction of 0.5% for a second year running in 2016, before strengthening to 1.7% in 2017. Again, it emphasised the substantial differences between the various performances. For Mexico, the Fund now forecasts a more moderate, but still positive pace of growth (2.4% in 2016 and 2.6% in 2017) “supported by healthy private domestic demand and spillovers from a robust US economy”.
By contrast, the Fund expects Brazil to post an annual GDP contraction of 3.8% for the second year running, as the recession takes its toll on employment and real incomes and domestic uncertainties “continue to constrain the government’s ability to formulate and execute policies”. With many of the large shocks from 2015–16 expected to have run their course, and helped by a weaker currency, growth is projected to turn positive during 2017, the Fund says, perhaps tacitly anticipating a change of government to a more orthodox, reform-minded and market-friendly administration. Hedging its bets however, the Fund notes that its Brazil forecast “is subject to large uncertainty”.
Venezuela is in deep recession and will stay there, the Fund says. Next door, Colombia too, suffering still from low oil prices and tighter macroeconomic and financial conditions, will decelerate to 2.5% this year, from 3.1% last year, which may make political life more difficult for President Juan Manuel Santos as he struggles to get a peace agreement with the country’s main left-wing guerrilla group, Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (Farc), over the line.
There are some bright spots in the region, notably including Peru, where a surge in copper output is driving up the headline result, which the Fund now puts at 3.1% in 2016 and 4.1% in 2017, setting a welcoming scene for the new government set to take office in July, which will be centre-right in hue. By contrast, in neighbouring Chile, where the fall in copper prices is exacerbated by the protracted decline in copper output, weighing on financing conditions at a time when the government is trying to fund its structural reforms, the IMF expects growth to slip to 1.5% this year, from 2.1% last year.
Finally, the IMF – for once – has nice words for Argentina, noting that “the ongoing push to correct macroeconomic imbalances and microeconomic distortions has improved prospects for growth in the medium term,” albeit it cautions that the adjustment will generate “a mild recession” in 2016.
Western Hemisphere Economies: Real GDP, Consumer Prices, Current Account Balance, and Unemployment
Source: IMF
- China – not SO bad
The IMF now expects GDP growth in China to slow to 6.5% in 2016 and 6.2% in 2017, which is a little better than its October 2015 forecast. This reflects another round of stimulus measures in China, however the Fund notes that further weakening is expected in the industrial sector, as excess capacity continues to unwind, “especially in real estate, related upstream industries, and manufacturing”. This is not good news for Latin American exporters of iron, steel and other inputs to China. The IMF is hopeful that services sector growth in China will be robust as the economy rebalances from investment to consumption. Whether Latin American companies can position themselves in the race to supply the expanding Chinese services sector, however, is unclear. To date, it has not been a competitive advantage.