The UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (Cepal) recently warned that South America needs to double its energy capacity by 2030 in order to avoid blackouts. Cepal estimates that the region needs to add about 200 gigawatts (GW) to its overall generation capacity in order to cope with forecast demand. It puts the total required investment, inclusive of transmission lines, at over US$500bn, which should fuel continued investment – foreign and local – in this fast-growing region.
Latin America is uniquely dependent on hydro electricity, which provides 50% of the total installed capacity of 278,000 megawatts (MW). In Brazil, hydro power accounted for 71% of the total installed capacity of 114,354 MW in May 2011, according to the ministry of mines and energy.
Regional energy demand rose 40% between 2001 and 2010. Brazil endured a politically costly power crisis in 2001, prompting the authorities to redouble efforts to add capacity. Brazil imports natural gas from Bolivia and is gradually building up its own domestic liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry. However, the main focus is on major hydro generation projects in the Amazon region, including a complex of four dams on the Madeira River in the state of Rondônia, and the massive US$11bn Belo Monte dam project on the Xingu River in the state of Pará. Two of the plants on the Madeira River, the Santo Antonio and Jirau dams, are due for completion in the next few years. A third, Tabajara (350MW), is slated for construction under the latest (2011-2014) growth acceleration program (PAC, in the Portuguese acronym). A fourth 800MW plant, Cachoeira Esperanza, will be sited on the Madeira River in northern Bolivia, just over the Rondônia state border.
Brazil also wants to construct a whole series of dams in up to seven countries in South America, including Argentina, Bolivia, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and French Guyana. In total, these planned hydro plants would add 12,000 MW to South America’s total generating capacity. The cornerstone of this strategy is the Brazil–Bolivia–Peru energy hub, under the Initiative for the Regional Integration of South American Infrastructure (IIRSA), which is supported by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the Andean Development Corporation (CAF), the Río de la Plata Development Fund (Fonplata) and Brazil’s National Economic and Social Development Bank (Bndes).
Some 7,000MW are slated to come from a planned six dams in Peru. In 2010, presidents Lula da Silva (2003-2010) and Alan García (1985-1990 & 2006-2011) inked a US$15bn build-operate deal, in conjunction with the Brazilian state electricity company, Eletrobrás. Under the deal Peru would have first dibs on the electricity produced, with Brazil committing to take the excess. Two proposed plants on the Uruguay River would provide another 2,000MW, to be shared between Argentina and Brazil, while over in Guyana, Eletrobrás is looking at a 1,500MW plant.
It’s been far from smooth sailing for these ambitious new schemes. There is particular resistance in the locally-affected Amazon states in Brazil and Peru. Communities have loudly protested a lack of proper consultation and there are also very real concerns about the welfare of indigenous tribes, including uncontacted tribes, in these remote Amazon regions.
In June, amid major protests in the Puno region, the Peruvian government temporarily cancelled (along with other concessions) a provisional licence awarded to a Brazilian consortium, Empresa de Generación Eléctrica Amazonas Sur (Egasur), for the construction of the first of the proposed dams, a 1,500MW plant on the River Inambari. Brazil’s Bndes was to provide the bulk of the US$4.9bn in financing. The Inambari dam is sited at the juncture of the Puno, Cusco and Madre de Dios regions in south-eastern Peru. According to Egasur’s feasibility study, the dam and reservoir would cover 37,800 hectares, requiring the relocation of some 70 communities. It would also flood 410km²of forest, encompassing part of the buffer zone around the Bahujan Sonene National Park. The inter-oceanic highway, also being financed by Brazil (to secure a Pacific trade outlet), could also be affected.
The second proposed dam, Pakitzapango (Junín), to be constructed by the Brazilian giant Odebrecht, was halted in 2010 via an administrative action by a local indigenous organization, Central Ashaninka del Río Ene. Another, Mainique (Cusco), has reverted back to the planners amid legal and environmental hurdles.
The new Peruvian government led by President Ollanta Humala will have to decide the fate of these projects. Humala has acknowledged that Peru is facing an imminent energy shortage in the north of the country and needs to invest in additional capacity. Peruvian environmental and indigenous activists suggested that Brazil’s tacit support of Humala in the 2011 election was for self interested commercial motives. A recent report by a Spanish bank, BBVA, notes that Brazilian foreign direct investment (FDI) in Peru has risen by over 30% on average annually since 2005, to reach an estimated US$3.5bn in 2011.
The government led by President Dilma Rousseff is undeterred. A recent presidential provisional measure (MP), officially published on 15 August, alters the demarcation of three Amazon national parks designated as natural protected areas (Unidades de Conservção [UCs]), so as to permit the Madeira River hydro complex. The measure compensates for the loss of protected lands in some areas with the extension of the park in others, which is also aimed at deterring illegal deforestation by loggers and commercial agri producers. Curiously, the measure also allows for mineral exploration around two of the parks.
Tensions in remote border zone
The deaths in late July of two Brazilian nationals employed by a Brazilian firm, Leme Engenharia, which is conducting feasibility studies for a hydro plant, raised eyebrows. Initial reports suggested that the pair, a 57-year old engineer and a 61-year old geologist, whose bodies were found 1km apart near the Maranon River, in the region of Jaén, might have been killed by locals in protest at the planned Vera Cruz plant, but the Brazilian embassy and the Peruvian police said that they appeared to have died of natural causes. The results of autopsies pointed to cerebral and pulmonary edemas, often caused by high altitude, though the corpses were discovered at 800m. The fact that the pair were rumoured to have been killed is testament to the sensitivity surrounding both the hydro-plants and Brazil’s expanding role in Latin America.
There has also been trouble on the Brazilian side of the border with Peru. In early August the justice ministry dispatched 16 national security force officers to Acre to provide security to employees of the National Indigenous Foundation (Funai) on the Xinane base, 20km from the border. Funai has raised the alarm about the fate of an uncontacted Amazon tribe, which it fears has been disturbed (or even killed) by Peruvian drug traffickers. In late July Brazilian police had arrested, for a second time, a Portuguese national and known drug trafficker, Joaquim Antônio Custódio Fadista. He had been arrested in the same area in March and extradited to Peru. Funai workers found a tribal arrow at a camp site used by the traffickers.
Brazil’s remote tribes (estimated at 77, with 30 identified) are under threat from drug traffickers, logging, oil companies and, activists note, the planned new Amazon dams. On 5 April the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights requested that the Brazilian government suspend the Belo Monte dam, citing its potential harm to the rights of traditional communities living within the Xingu river basin. The ruling appears to have been ignored. A statement by Amnesty International to mark the International Day of the World’s Indigenous People on 9 August was critical of Brazil and suggested the Funai doesn’t have sufficient resources to fulfil its role.
- Changes to Brazil’s natural protected areas (UCs)
Rômulo Mello, president of the Chico Mendes Institute, insists that demarcation changes to protected areas in Rondônia amount to a win-win for the government and environmentalists. Like the government, the Institute is in favour of controlled economic development in the Amazon in order to provide the local population with sustainable livelihoods. Another two UCs in Pará will also be amended to facilitate the planned Tapajós River hydro complex. On 11 December the state of Pará will hold a referendum on the division of its territory into three (Pará, Tapajós and Carajás). It’s unclear what this will mean for the UCs in Pará, as currently constituted. Brazil has committed at the UN to assigning protected biodiversity status to 17% of its national territory, up from 15%-16% now. Agri producers complain the country is being turned into a national park.
- Rio Tapajós
The Rio Tapajós hydro complex envisages five plants with an installed capacity of 10.6GW. The projects include São Luiz do Tapajós (6.1GW), Jatobá (2.3GW), Cachoeira dos Patos (528MW), Jamanxin (881MW) and Cachoeriro do Caí (802MW).