CUBA: Keeping the momentum going
Following the historic restoration of diplomatic relations on 20 July, the US government led by President Barack Obama has continued with small but incremental moves - within the available legal parameters - towards the continuing liberalisation of US ties with Cuba.
A couple of days after the two interests sections in Havana and Washington were upgraded to embassy status, Reuters reported that the White House hosted a closed-door meeting with Cuban American notables, academics and business leaders supportive of the re-engagement with Cuba to discuss the state of play. According to the report, White House officials said that the administration and its agencies (led by the US Treasury and Commerce departments) had no plans to announce further measures regarding Cuba and was still refining the various regulations to date announced, including reforms to ease travel rules and financial and banking changes unveiled in January last. “The administration feels they have gone as far as they can right now. They want to broaden the base of stakeholders ... create the space for others, including Republican members of Congress, to take steps”, one attendee told the newswire.
The next day, the Republican-controlled US Senate Appropriations Committee voted 18-12 (with 14 Democrats joined by four Republicans) to back an amendment to the Financial Services and General Government bill for the next fiscal year that would eliminate the general prohibition on travel to Cuba. The Committee also passed another amendment to allow private financing for US agricultural sales and lift restrictions on ships that call at Cuban ports.
Attaching these amendments to the appropriations bill increases the likelihood that they will come up for a vote in the Senate plenary, according to US commentators. To become law, a version of the bill would also have to pass through the House of Representatives. Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy, who represents the agricultural state of Vermont, and who long has argued that US policy towards Cuba is counterproductive, stated: “This is a first step by the Senate to dismantle a failed, discredited and counterproductive policy that in 54 years has failed to achieve any of its objectives”.
While the amendments, first mooted earlier in the year in response to the White House measures, have minimal chance of full approval, they suggest the growing strength on Capitol Hill of the pro-engagement lobby. Consistently lobbing these kinds of bills at Congress may, eventually, generate the kind of momentum needed for a serious discussion of the removal of the half century-old US economic embargo on Cuba, which is codified into law and can only be lifted by an act of congress. And while the leading Republican presidential runners for 2016, including the conservative Cuban-American senator Marco Rubio (FLA), have vowed to roll back all the changes made by Obama and even break off diplomatic relations again, the leading Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, has put some clear blue water between her campaign and that of her Republican competitors by coming out with an official call for the end of the embargo.
In a speech made in Miami on 31 July, Clinton, whose husband Bill Clinton took a hardline stance on Cuba whilst in office (1993-2001) - a period that coincided with Cuba’s special period, and the 1995 Cuban shooting down of a Miami-Cuban exile plane, which resulted in the 1996 Helms Burton Act codifying the embargo - said she had changed her mind on US-Cuba policy towards the end of her term as Obama’s secretary of state (2009-2013). “Cuban people have waited long enough for progress to come… The Cuba embargo needs to go, once and for all. We should replace it with a smarter approach that empowers the Cuban private sector, Cuban civil society and the Cuban-American community to spur progress and keep pressure on the regime…They have it backwards: Engagement is not a gift to the Castros – it’s a threat to the Castros. An American embassy in Havana isn’t a concession – it’s a beacon”, she stated.
- “Most Republican candidates running for president would play right into the hardliners’ hands. They would reverse the progress we have made. Fundamentally, most of the Republican candidates still view Cuba, and Latin America more broadly, through an outdated cold war lens. For them ideology trumps evidence, and so they remain incapable of moving us forward.” –Hillary Clinton argues for the removal of the US embargo on Cuba.



