PERU: Opposition moves to impeach Castillo
Three right-wing opposition parties presented a motion of impeachment against Peru’s President Pedro Castillo on 25 November, after gaining enough signatures to make the motion eligible for debate in Peru’s congress. For now, Castillo does not appear to be in immediate danger – 52 votes would be needed to trigger an impeachment trial, and 87 deputies would then need to vote against the president in order to remove him from office. That currently seems unlikely. However, the 29 November announcement of preliminary investigations into Castillo by the comptroller general and attorney general’s office into alleged backroom deals over infrastructure projects may incite further legislative rebellion.
The impeachment motion came as little surprise. Calls for President Castillo’s removal from office have come thick and fast over his scandal-plagued first four months in the presidency, and it was practically inevitable that these would eventually materialise into a formal request for his impeachment. The motion, which was made possible after gaining 28 signatures from the right-wing Fuerza Popular (FP; Fujimoristas) and Avanza País (AP), and the far-right Renovación Popular (RP), charges Castillo with the broad offence of moral incapacity – the same justification used for the impeachment of former president Martín Vizcarra (2018-2020).
It bases this accusation on a wide range of offences, including alleged illegal campaign financing on behalf of Castillo [WR-21-32], the appointment of cabinet ministers allegedly connected to the Maoist guerrilla group Sendero Luminoso (SL) [WR-21-39], and apparent influence peddling in the military [WR-21-46]. More vaguely, it also accuses Castillo of “weakening democracy” by improving relations with President Nicolás Maduro’s government in Venezuela, and of weakening the struggle against misogynistic violence by appointing cabinet ministers accused of domestic abuse.
As things stand, Castillo is not on the ropes just yet. He appeared unconcerned on 25 November, stating that he “is not worried about the political noise because the people have chosen me, not the mafias or the corrupt”. The three parties that supported the impeachment motion have 43 deputies between them – the support of a further nine deputies could trigger an impeachment trial, but there is little sign so far that the requisite 87 deputies could then be found to convict Castillo.
That could change depending on the trajectory of two preliminary investigations that were opened into Castillo by the comptroller general and attorney general’s office on 29 November. These follow reports of a series of unofficial meetings between Castillo, government ministers, and business representatives at Castillo’s private address in Lima, which were not noted in the official presidential registry. Footage broadcast by América Televisión shows that one of the attendees was Karelim López Arredondo, a consultant for the Puente Tarata III consortium, which on 19 October won a US$255.9m state contract to deliver infrastructure projects in the San Martín region.
The comptroller general’s office said it is now “examining the contracts or funding awarded…by the transport and communications ministry to a company linked to suspected influence peddling”. The attorney general’s office, meanwhile, has requested further information from the Castillo administration on the meetings. This could bode ill for the president, who can scarcely afford a corruption scandal at a time when the right is campaigning for more moderate deputies to join the impeachment drive.
Bruno Pacheco
The attorney general’s office announced on 1 December that Pedro Castillo’s former presidential secretary, Bruno Pacheco, who resigned on 19 November, is under preliminary investigation in relation to alleged illicit enrichment. Pacheco, who stood down after being accused of influence trafficking in the military [WR-21-46], was subsequently found by investigators to have stashed US$20,000 in his bathroom in the presidential palace. The attorney general’s office also reported discrepancies in Pacheco’s accounts, with his income as presidential secretary being greater than his official salary, and it is investigating a further US$20,000 cash deposit made by his chauffeur in August. Any proof of corruption in Castillo’s inner circle could hinder his efforts to prevent an impeachment trial.