For over three decades Chile has been governed by a succession of mainly moderate centre-left and centre-right coalitions. Like Costa Rica in Central America, Chile in the South American context has a reputation for strong democratic institutions and low levels of political or criminal violence. Yet it is also the case that concerns over violence and crime have been increasing and that Chilean voters have become increasingly alienated from what they see as a self-serving political establishment. The election of the far-right José Antonio Kast in late 2025 is therefore seen as an important break with the past.
It is important to remember that Kast’s election was preceded by six years of what, by Chilean historical standards at least, was a period of extraordinary political turmoil. The starting point was the Estallido Social that began in October 2019 when students demonstrating against transport fare increases triggered nationwide protests over inequality, pensions, healthcare, education, wages, and what were seen as the privileges of the embedded political elite. The protests swept the country leaving a death toll of over 30, along with thousands of injured.
At the time, the right-wing government of President Sebastián Piñera had responded by declaring a state of emergency. It rapidly found itself, along with almost all the other major political parties, having to agree to a process of major constitutional reform. A new constitution was widely seen as a chance to revisit and rebuild basic rules of social co-existence and a shared understanding between all members of the community. There were in fact two attempts at fundamental constitutional reform, one led from the left (2022) and one by the right (2023). Both were ultimately failures, taking Chile back to square one and to reliance on the existing 1980 constitution, written during military rule but subsequently heavily amended.
The first attempt at reforming the constitution by electing a constituent assembly was approved by 78% voters in an “entry referendum”. The elected assembly that later emerged was dominated by left-wing, environmental, and indigenous lobby groups. It produced a radical, “progressive” constitutional draft which in the end went much further than public opinion was prepared to travel. As a result, in the “exit referendum” of September 2022 a majority of 62% of the country’s voters rejected the new draft. The government reacted by repeating the entire process with shorter deadlines and different, tighter criteria for the election of constituents, and a greater role for constitutional lawyers and experts. A much more conservative draft constitution then emerged which this time also failed to convince public opinion. In the “exit referendum” of December 2023 this too was rejected, by 56% to 44% of the total vote. Many analysts have concluded that “middle Chile” turned away, losing its appetite for change. From this viewpoint constitutional reform is now likely to be off the Chilean political agenda for a decade or more.
The complex and exhausting constitutional debate was played out in parallel with Chile’s familiar left-right political cycle. The coalition of right-wing parties, incumbent at the time of the Estallido Social experienced a sharp drop in popularity. By the same token Chile’s left-wing coalition seemed to be riding a wave of popular support. Indeed, the 2021 elections delivered victory for Gabriel Boric, a former left-wing student activist who became Chile’s youngest president. There were other important and contrasting developments. The Chile Vamos coalition of traditional right-wing parties, tainted by the memories of its mishandling of the Estallido Social, performed very poorly. Its nominated candidate, Sebastián Sichel, came fourth in the first-round ballot with 12.79% of the vote. Second, in what could be described as an early warning of an emerging change of mood in the country, Kast of the far-right Partido Republicano (PR) experienced an unprecedented surge of support to become the most-voted candidate in the first round, with nearly one third of votes cast (27.91%). Second place went to Boric with 25.82%, and third to Franco Parisi, a populist, with 12.81%.
The scene was therefore set for Boric and Kast to fight the second-round ballot in late 2021. In this poll Boric emerged victorious with 55.87% of the vote, defeating Kast who received 44.13%. In short, the 2021 election confirmed the advance of the left while showing that an important repositioning was taking place on the right, with Kast presenting a new and more radical version of conservative “anti-establishment” thinking. In power, Boric’s popularity reached something of a high-water mark in the early stages of his presidency but deteriorated rapidly thereafter as his government struggled with internal disagreements, issues of crime and security, and disappointing economic growth rates. With the benefit of hindsight, the constitutional deadlock did not help him at all.
It was only at the very beginning of Boric’s presidency that his approval rate exceeded those disapproving. By March 2025, the beginning of his last year in office, Boric had a 29% approval rate, which was dwarfed by a massive 64% disapproval rare, as measured by pollster Cadem.
|
Country
|
Chile
|
|
President
|
José Antonio Kast
|
|
Main 2026 electoral promises
|
-
Launch a plan against organised crime, drug trafficking, and violence
-
Strengthen Carabineros (military police) and introduce longer sentences
-
Build high-security prisons and restore state control of these facilities
-
Strengthen borders, make illegal immigration a criminal offence, deport undocumented immigrants
-
Reduce size of government, reduce bureaucracy, encourage investment and entrepreneurship
-
Cut government spending by US$6bn over 18 months
-
Reduce tax burden and eliminate property taxes for primary residences
-
Reform pensions, housing, and health
-
Pay Cl$2m (US$2,043) per newly born child in an attempt to increase the birth rate
-
Review and streamline government bureaucracy
|
|
Round one election results
|
Round one was held on 16 November 2025 and won by Jeannette Jara of the Unidad Por Chile centre-left coalition with 26.85% of the vote. Kast, at the head of the far-right Cambio por Chile coalition, came second with 23.93%. Third place went to Franco Parisis of Partido de la Gente (PDG) with 19.71% of the vote.
|
|
Round two election results
|
The second-round run-off was held on 14 December 2025 and was won by Kast, with 58.16% of the vote, while Jara gained 41.84%.
|
|
Date sworn in
|
11 March 2026
|
|
First 100 days in office reached on
|
19 June 2026
|
|
Situation in Congress
|
No parties or coalitions have an automatic majority in congress. There are 155 seats in the chamber of deputies and 78 are needed for a majority. Kast’s coalition has 42; the centre-left Unidad por Chile has 61, while the traditional right, gathered in Chile Grande y Unido, has 34. Some combinations of these coalitions are needed for the approval of any new legislation. Small parties such as the PDG (14 seats) may hold the balance.
The senate has 50 seats; 26 are needed for a majority. Kast’s coalition has seven seats, the centre-left coalition has 20, and the traditional right has 18.
|
Kast had a difficult start to his presidency. He came to office arguing that he needed to lead an emergency government focused on three priorities: security, immigration, and economic recovery. The new government did in fact claim progress in all three of those areas with short-term reductions in the homicide rate, new physical barriers built on the northern frontier (including a ditch), and a “mega reform” of economic policy approved in congress. Progress was also made on a new draconian security reform designed to give the government increased emergency powers.
Yet the administration also seemed at times disunited and disorganised. After only two months in office the new president was forced to conduct his first ministerial reshuffle, replacing his security minister who had publicly admitted that despite all the electoral promises made, the new government lacked an operational security plan. An abrupt removal of fuel subsidies along with the promised government spending cutbacks did not help the new president’s popularity. An ill-advised attempt to censure a former economy minister backfired and was rejected by congress. On the campaign trail Kast had promised to forcibly arrest and expel all undocumented foreigners in the country (estimated at around 360,000). In office, however, he said that such illegal immigrants would instead be “invited” to leave voluntarily and contribute to their travel costs.
Opinion polls captured the critical mood. Since inauguration in March Kast’s approval rating plunged by 20 percentage points to 36% in May according to Cadem. After reaching his first 100 days in office Kast’s approval rate stood at 44% with a higher disapproval rate of 53%. Respondents were asked what his main campaign promise had been: 44% said it was tackling insecurity, while 30% said it was pushing back irregular migration. When asked if the government had a concrete security plan, 36% agreed while 64% disagreed. Support remained strong for the ‘Plan Escudo Fronterizo’ (Border Shield Plan) however, with 57% approving.
Among political analysts there were mixed responses. Marco Moreno of Universidad Central de Chile, a private university, told Chilean current affairs radio programme ‘Palabras Sacan Palabras’ in June that the president’s initial political credit was beginning to run out. Kast, Moreno said, had promised order, decisiveness, and speed, but voters were questioning whether that was producing tangible results.