Between the waves (1): the rise of green politics
A new factor that evolved between the first and second waves of the pink tide is that environmental or ‘green’ concerns have risen much higher up the political agenda. This is in line with a global context in which climate change issues have become much more pressing. In some cases, the resource nationalism of the first wave (a focus on gaining more control and higher value from the extraction of raw materials) is being replaced in the emerging second wave by a much wider set of green policies designed to protect the environment and create a pathway towards a net carbon-zero economy at some point near the middle of this century. There is a widespread perception that action to prevent continued global warming is increasingly urgent.
Despite that, in the early 2020s pink tide political leaders have far from united around the desirability of green policies. As we have seen, Mexican President López Obrador places a much higher priority on using the country’s fossil fuels to achieve energy self-sufficiency. He has therefore promoted increased oil and gas production by Pemex, the state-owned oil company, as well as backing the construction of new refining capacity, and the use of fossil fuels in domestic electric power generation. AMLO has also called for the nationalisation of lithium mining.
In stark contrast, during his election campaign in Colombia, left wing candidate Gustavo Petro promised to stop all new oil exploration and to focus instead on renewable energy sources. Petro has said: “We have to move from an extractive economy to a productive one. The energy transition is a decision that can be made on day one. Foreign exchange from oil can be replaced with tourism, and that means jumping from 5m to 15m tourists annually.”
Significantly, Petro appointed a charismatic Afro-Colombian environmental campaigner, Francia Márquez, as his vice-presidential running mate. Márquez has noted that “both the left and the right are fomenting a policy of extractivism, when humanity faces the challenge today of transitioning from this extractivist economy to a sustainable economy. Life isn't possible without our planet.”
in Brazil left-wing presidential candidate Lula has tried to adopt a mid-way position arguing that the country must continue producing oil and gas until renewable capacity rises sufficiently to provide a sustainable alternative. In Lula's first wave presidency oil and gas production (particularly from pre-salt offshore oil fields) played a key part in the extended commodities super-cycle and in the associated economic boom. Put bluntly, extractivism was an integral part of Lula's initial political success.
Lula, in fact, has a mixed record on the environment. His two previous administrations are credited with achieving a major reduction in Amazon deforestation. But these years also saw the building of the Belo Monte hydroelectric plant, notorious for causing environmental damage in the Xingu region. In current circumstances, with international attention focusing on the danger posed by deforestation in the Amazon, Lula has been keen to shift towards a somewhat greener position. Senator Humberto Costa, a close ally of the presidential candidate. has said that if Lula is elected, there will be a faster energy transition, with accelerated development of wind, solar, and bio-mass energy. Costa also says that only “self-sustaining development” will be allowed in the Amazon rainforest. Some of the candidate's advisers recommend a Brazilian version of the Green New Deal or ‘green pact’ advocated in the US.
The new government of Gabriel Boric in Chile is led by a younger generation of activists who are much more sensitive and attuned to environmental issues. They are for example supporting new legislation that would make carbon neutrality obligatory by 2050. Boric appointed Maisa Rojas, a prominent climate scientist, as his minister for the environment. Even in Bolivia, with a long history of resource nationalism, the leftist government of President Luis Arce now says it is prepared to tap outside expertise in the development of natural gas and lithium deposits.
Some experts, such as Mathias Alencastro of the Brazilian Centre for Analysis and Planning, argue that extractivism was a key part of the first move to the left. He says, “the first wave, which ran from 2003 to 2014, coincided with a major commodity cycle that totally defined these government’s successes and failures”. A repeat of that long boom is highly unlikely, but Alencastro believes that, in itself, is a reason for optimism. “Climate policy is precisely what differentiates the first and second wave”, he says, adding “without a positive commodities cycle, the left will be forced to be more daring. The green economy fills that void.”