Development: Huge demonstrations brought La Paz to a halt on 16 May.
Peasants from the surrounding Altiplano and teachers marched in the capital. In
the centre of the country, miners squared up to cocagrowers. Today, 17 May
President Carlos Mesa has to decide what to do about the hydrocarbons law,
passed by congress.
Significance: The size of the demonstration and the cancellation of
Mesa's national convention for Bolivian unity, scheduled for 16 May, heaps more
pressure on the government. The radicals, who have been led by Evo Morales, the
head of the Movimiento al Socialismo, the second biggest party in congress and
also the leader of the cocagrowers, the most cohesive extraparliamentary group,
are upping their demands. The MAS is undecided whether to take up the radicals'
demands for the complete nationalisation of the hydrocarbons industry and the
closure of congress.
The demonstrations were large and rowdy. At least one politician was
attacked. Congress was evacuated after demonstrators spilled into the Plaza
Murillo on which congress and the presidential palace sit. The police defended
this area with water cannon and tear gas. One demonstrator was arrested for
carrying explosives.
The hydrocarbons bill is emblematic both for the government and the radicals.
The government argues that the law as it emerged from congress, calling for an
18% royalty and a 32% tax on hydrocarbons, is too confiscatory. The government
fears that such rates will deter foreign investment in the crucial gas industry:
without foreign investment there will be no gas industry, the government, and
the energy companies, argue. The left says that the bill, approved by congress
on 5 May, is still too advantageous to the energy companies. In particular the
MAS wants the restoration of the clause which gave indigenous people a veto over
all hydrocarbon projects. Congress ruled that indigenous people had to be
consulted about projects.
The hydrocarbons bill is not the only problem facing the government. The
prosperous east of the country, which wants a milder version of the hydrocarbons
law, also wants directly elected departmental governors and devolution. The
poorer, Indian western highlands are less keen on this, fearing that the east
will keep more of the money it earns. The west also wants devolution to be
decided by a constituent assembly, where the highlanders will be dominant.
Congress has failed to produce the legislation enabling the gubernatorial
elections to go ahead simultaneously with a referendum on autonomy. This failure
means that devolution will be delayed, infuriating secessionists in the east.
Today the president has to pick one of four options for the hydrocarbons
bill: he can veto the whole bill; veto bits of the bill; approve the bill or
allow congress to approve the bill. A two-thirds majority of congress overrides
the presidential veto.
The buzz in La Paz is that the president will probably veto the key parts of
the bill. One of his advisers said yesterday that there were three or four
clauses in the bill which were life or death for the country and 20% of changes
made by congress have serious implications.
The government was hinting on 16 May that it will overturn at least three key
congressional amendments: one is the modification to its initial suggestion of
an 18% royalty rate coupled with a progressive rate of taxation, capped at 32%.
Another is the requirement that all current energy concessions are subject to
the new law, without negotiation. A third is the call for the re-establishment
of the state energy company, YPFB.