CHILE: Palestine policy makes waves
President Gabriel Boric of Chile announced on 21 December his government’s intention of opening an embassy in Palestine, where the South American country currently only has a trade office. This elicited criticism from Chile’s Jewish community and follows a diplomatic hiccough with Israel earlier this year.
Chile is home to the largest Palestinian community outside of the Arab world, with Chileans of Palestinian descent estimated to number between 300,000 and half a million. Boric made the announcement about the embassy during a Christmas event with Chile’s Palestinian community in Santiago.
- Palestinians in Chile
The first wave of Arab migrants to Chile came at the turn of the 20th century, during the final years of the Ottoman Empire. The disintegration of the Ottoman Empire in 1922 and the creation of Israel in 1948 saw more Palestinians migrate towards the Americas in the wake of the First and Second World Wars. According to academics, the arrival of the first Palestinian migrants in Chile caused a sort of domino effect in drawing larger numbers, with the country’s climate, freedom, and economic prosperity all proving attractive to the Arab immigrants.
“One of the government’s decisions […] is to raise the rank of our official representation in Palestine and we will open an embassy to give it the representation it deserves,” Boric said. “We cannot forget a community that is suffering an illegal occupation, a community that is resisting, a community that is seeing its rights and its dignity violated every day, and that this is absolutely unjust,” the president went on, adding that it hurts him to not see Palestine represented on Google Maps. Chile opened an office of representation in Palestine in 1998 and recognised the territory as a state in 2011.
In an official statement, Chile’s Palestinian community thanked Boric’s decision as a “concrete act of support to the right of self-determination of the Palestinian people”, as well as an act that “undoubtedly contributes to peace”. Speaking to the local press, the head of international NGO Amnesty International in Chile, Rodrigo Bustos, also celebrated the decision as helping advance human rights.
Chile’s Israeli community unsurprisingly did not share the same view. “We are preoccupied to see that, once again, the narrative of the messages regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, instead of encouraging peace and a solution between states, focuses on exacerbating the problem by referring to the ‘Palestinian resistance’,” the Chilean Community of Israel wrote in a letter addressed to Foreign Minister Antonia Urrejola.
Urrejola confirmed Boric’s announcement to the press, clarifying that Chile’s representative in Palestine currently has the status of ambassador, but that the plan is to also raise the rank of the office there. She brushed away concerns that this might hurt Chile’s relations with Israel, where some 10,000 Chilean nationals live.
The Boric administration already suffered a diplomatic hiccough with Israel earlier last September, when the president refused to accept the credentials of the Middle Eastern country’s envoy presented to him one day after a Palestinian teenager was killed during a raid of the West Bank by Israeli forces. In response to what it considered a grave breach of protocol, Israel summoned Chile’s ambassador to express its discontent, saying that Boric’s behaviour “seriously affects” the two countries’ relationship. Chile eventually accepted ambassador Gil Artzyeli’s credentials a fortnight later.
Former student leader Boric has a history of being critical of Israel when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – a position that will be shared by the more left-wing elements in his coalition, many of whom are disgruntled with the centrist turn that the Boric government has taken on a variety of issues. Standing fast on his pro-Palestine position could therefore be a way for Boric to try and placate these allies.